SDMHF vs WAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SDMHF is a Buy and WAT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SDMHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- SDMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SDMHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SDMHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SDMHF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while WAT (@Medical Specialties) price change was -6.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
WAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (-4.45% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| SDMHF | WAT | SDMHF / WAT | |
| Capitalization | 28.9B | 20.4B | 142% |
| EBITDA | 1.16B | 1B | 116% |
| Gain YTD | -23.602 | 9.477 | -249% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.84 | 31.78 | 113% |
| Revenue | 3.36B | 2.96B | 114% |
| Total Cash | 113M | 396M | 29% |
| Total Debt | 1.31B | 2.44B | 54% |
SDMHF | WAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 23 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SDMHF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as WAT (82) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that SDMHF’s stock grew similarly to WAT’s over the last 12 months.
WAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SDMHF (85) in the null industry. This means that WAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SDMHF’s over the last 12 months.
WAT's SMR Rating (19) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SDMHF (82) in the null industry. This means that WAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SDMHF’s over the last 12 months.
WAT's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SDMHF (53) in the null industry. This means that WAT’s stock grew similarly to SDMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SDMHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as WAT (30) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that SDMHF’s stock grew similarly to WAT’s over the last 12 months.
| SDMHF | WAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CTA | 28.97 | 0.44 | +1.54% |
| Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| HYLG | 23.64 | -0.36 | -1.48% |
| Global X Health Care Cvrd Cll&Gr ETF | |||
| NULC | 47.53 | -0.75 | -1.56% |
| Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF | |||
| KCCA | 19.36 | -0.33 | -1.68% |
| KraneShares California Carbon Allw ETF | |||
| FLJP | 28.46 | -0.73 | -2.50% |
| Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | |||
SDMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SDMHF has been loosely correlated with SOAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SDMHF jumps, then SOAGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SDMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDMHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOAGY - SDMHF | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| SRTOY - SDMHF | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| JNDOF - SDMHF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WAT - SDMHF | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.56% | ||
| SNN - SDMHF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||
WAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAT has been closely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAT jumps, then A could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAT | 100% | -3.56% | ||
| A - WAT | 78% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| MTD - WAT | 75% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| TMO - WAT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| BRKR - WAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.20% | ||
| RVTY - WAT | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.89% | ||
More | ||||