It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SEAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SEAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SEAC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while TDC (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.
SEAC is expected to report earnings on Jun 07, 2023.
TDC is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
SEAC | TDC | SEAC / TDC | |
Capitalization | 12.6M | 3.78B | 0% |
EBITDA | 626K | 263M | 0% |
Gain YTD | 136.364 | -25.925 | -526% |
P/E Ratio | 0.58 | 62.97 | 1% |
Revenue | 32.8M | 1.83B | 2% |
Total Cash | 15.2M | 486M | 3% |
Total Debt | 1.22M | 640M | 0% |
SEAC | TDC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SEAC's Valuation (42) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as TDC (69) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew similarly to TDC’s over the last 12 months.
TDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as SEAC (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that TDC’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
TDC's SMR Rating (16) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEAC (95) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that TDC’s stock grew significantly faster than SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
SEAC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as TDC (52) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew similarly to TDC’s over the last 12 months.
SEAC's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as TDC (92) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew similarly to TDC’s over the last 12 months.
SEAC | TDC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEAC has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEAC jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC | 100% | N/A | ||
PUBM - SEAC | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
TDC - SEAC | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SOPA - SEAC | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
DDOG - SEAC | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
LTCH - SEAC | 33% Poorly correlated | +30.41% | ||
More |