Ad is loading...
SEBC
Price
$22.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
SFDL
Price
$27.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

SEBC vs SFDL

Header iconSEBC vs SFDL Comparison
Open Charts SEBC vs SFDLBanner chart's image
Southeastern Banking
Price$22.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$136
CapitalizationN/A
Security Federal
Price$27.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.77K
CapitalizationN/A
SEBC vs SFDL Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEBC vs. SFDL commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEBC is a Hold and SFDL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SEBC: $22.27 vs. SFDL: $27.00)
Brand notoriety: SEBC and SFDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEBC: 13% vs. SFDL: 959%
Market capitalization -- SEBC: $22.69M vs. SFDL: $81.33M
SEBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.69M. SFDL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFDL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SEBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFDL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEBC is a better buy in the long-term than SFDL.

Price Growth

SEBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SFDL (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFDL($81.3M) has a higher market cap than SEBC($22.7M). SEBC YTD gains are higher at: 20.643 vs. SFDL (19.428). SEBC has less debt than SFDL: SEBC (5M) vs SFDL (61.3M). SFDL has higher revenues than SEBC: SFDL (47.8M) vs SEBC (15.9M).
SEBCSFDLSEBC / SFDL
Capitalization22.7M81.3M28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.64319.428106%
P/E RatioN/A7.42-
Revenue15.9M47.8M33%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5M61.3M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEBC vs SFDL: Fundamental Ratings
SEBC
SFDL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30100
SMR RATING
1..100
4758
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4844
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFDL's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SEBC (38). This means that SFDL’s stock grew similarly to SEBC’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFDL (100). This means that SEBC’s stock grew significantly faster than SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SFDL (58). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SFDL (47). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SFDL's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SEBC (48). This means that SFDL’s stock grew similarly to SEBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVDV65.940.18
+0.27%
Avantis International Small Cap Val ETF
XTAP34.44N/A
N/A
Innovator US Equity Acltd Pls ETF™ April
HYGW32.29-0.10
-0.31%
iShares High Yld Crp Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
RSPN53.28-0.46
-0.86%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Indls ETF
RSEE30.89-0.47
-1.50%
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF

SEBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEBC and PEBC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEBC and PEBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEBC
1D Price
Change %
SEBC100%
N/A
PEBC - SEBC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKFL - SEBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWCB - SEBC
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
SFDL - SEBC
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCZC - SEBC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SFDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFDL and BXRBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFDL and BXRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFDL
1D Price
Change %
SFDL100%
N/A
BXRBF - SFDL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNFSF - SFDL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - SFDL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - SFDL
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
CMGGF - SFDL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More