Advertisement
SENEA vs SENEB
To understand the difference between Seneca Foods Corp. - Ordinary Shares - Class A (SENEA) vs. Seneca Foods Corp. - Ordinary Shares - Class B (SENEB) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class A and Ordinary Shares - Class B
Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.
Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SENEA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SENEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SENEB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SENEA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENEB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SENEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SENEB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SENEA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.95% price change this week, while SENEB (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.57% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| SENEA | SENEB | SENEA / SENEB | |
| Capitalization | 404M | 409M | 99% |
| EBITDA | 145M | 145M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 29.561 | 31.596 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.41 | 7.48 | 99% |
| Revenue | 1.48B | 1.48B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 7.17M | 7.17M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 669M | 669M | 100% |
SENEA | SENEB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SENEA's Valuation (76) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEB (76). This means that SENEA’s stock grew similarly to SENEB’s over the last 12 months.
SENEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEB (23). This means that SENEA’s stock grew similarly to SENEB’s over the last 12 months.
SENEA's SMR Rating (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEB (79). This means that SENEA’s stock grew similarly to SENEB’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (42). This means that SENEB’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (7). This means that SENEB’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.
| SENEA | SENEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 26 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
Advertisement
SENEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SENEA and UTZ have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SENEA and UTZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENEA | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| UTZ - SENEA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| FLO - SENEA | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| KHC - SENEA | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
| JBSS - SENEA | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| CPB - SENEA | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
SENEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SENEB and HRL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SENEB and HRL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENEB | 100% | N/A | ||
| HRL - SENEB | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| BRCC - SENEB | 21% Poorly correlated | +20.16% | ||
| BGS - SENEB | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| HLF - SENEB | 7% Poorly correlated | -6.81% | ||
| SENEA - SENEB | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||