It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SER’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZEOX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
SER (@Biotechnology) experienced а +10.78% price change this week, while ZEOX (@Biotechnology) price change was +17.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -8.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.62%.
SER is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
SER | ZEOX | SER / ZEOX | |
Capitalization | 42.9M | 14M | 306% |
EBITDA | N/A | -4.63M | - |
Gain YTD | 1154.545 | 107.843 | 1,071% |
P/E Ratio | 30.53 | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | 4.93M | - |
Total Cash | 6.06M | 746K | 813% |
Total Debt | 11.7M | 685K | 1,708% |
SER | ZEOX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZEOX's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SER (63). This means that ZEOX’s stock grew somewhat faster than SER’s over the last 12 months.
ZEOX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SER (100). This means that ZEOX’s stock grew similarly to SER’s over the last 12 months.
ZEOX's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SER (100). This means that ZEOX’s stock grew similarly to SER’s over the last 12 months.
SER's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ZEOX (38). This means that SER’s stock grew similarly to ZEOX’s over the last 12 months.
SER's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZEOX (100). This means that SER’s stock grew significantly faster than ZEOX’s over the last 12 months.
RSI ODDS (%) |
Stochastic ODDS (%) |
Momentum ODDS (%) |
MACD ODDS (%) |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
Advances ODDS (%) |
Declines ODDS (%) |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
Aroon ODDS (%) |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IBTJ | 21.41 | 0.05 | +0.21% |
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Tr ETF | |||
MNBD | 25.83 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF | |||
WNDY | 11.47 | -0.03 | -0.23% |
Global X Wind Energy ETF | |||
NULV | 41.71 | -0.16 | -0.38% |
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | |||
PXE | 31.20 | -0.31 | -0.98% |
Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SER has been closely correlated with LIANY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SER jumps, then LIANY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SER | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SER | 100% | -3.40% | ||
LIANY - SER | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
GERN - SER | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
XTLB - SER | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
OTLK - SER | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
ELVN - SER | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZEOX and QURE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZEOX and QURE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZEOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ZEOX | 100% | N/A | ||
QURE - ZEOX | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.07% | ||
QTTB - ZEOX | 14% Poorly correlated | -7.52% | ||
LENZ - ZEOX | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
LIANY - ZEOX | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SER - ZEOX | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
More |