SF
Price
$91.39
Change
-$0.17 (-0.19%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
74 days until earnings call
VALU
Price
$39.35
Change
+$0.13 (+0.33%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
383.41M
Ad is loading...

SF vs VALU

Header iconSF vs VALU Comparison
Open Charts SF vs VALUBanner chart's image
Stifel Financial
Price$91.39
Change-$0.17 (-0.19%)
Volume$414.8K
Capitalization7.95B
Value Line
Price$39.35
Change+$0.13 (+0.33%)
Volume$1.49K
Capitalization383.41M
SF vs VALU Comparison Chart
Loading...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SF vs. VALU commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SF is a Buy and VALU is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (SF: $91.39 vs. VALU: $39.35)
Brand notoriety: SF and VALU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SF: 42% vs. VALU: 16%
Market capitalization -- SF: $7.95B vs. VALU: $383.41M
SF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.95B. VALU’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $383.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVALU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VALU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SF and VALU are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VALU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VALU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VALU is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.21% price change this week, while VALU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

VALU is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($7.95B) has a higher market cap than VALU($383M). VALU has higher P/E ratio than SF: VALU (20.97) vs SF (18.06). SF YTD gains are higher at: -13.473 vs. VALU (-24.328). VALU has less debt than SF: VALU (5.13M) vs SF (1.18B). SF has higher revenues than VALU: SF (4.29B) vs VALU (38.2M).
SFVALUSF / VALU
Capitalization7.95B383M2,074%
EBITDAN/A11.8M-
Gain YTD-13.473-24.32855%
P/E Ratio18.0620.9786%
Revenue4.29B38.2M11,233%
Total CashN/A67.3M-
Total Debt1.18B5.13M22,920%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF vs VALU: Fundamental Ratings
SF
VALU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1776
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2378
SMR RATING
1..100
840
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6264
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VALU's Valuation (28) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that VALU’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VALU (78) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VALU’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VALU (40) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to VALU’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VALU (53) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to VALU’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VALU (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to VALU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFVALU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRISX15.300.16
+1.06%
Harbor International Small Cap Admin
CVLVX13.440.01
+0.07%
Cullen Value I
WENCX35.03N/A
N/A
Allspring Mid Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
GTSAX26.31N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Growth A
PFGKX34.21N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth R6

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-0.19%
GS - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
EVR - SF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
PIPR - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
MS - SF
84%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
RJF - SF
84%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
More

VALU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VALU and PIPR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VALU and PIPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VALU
1D Price
Change %
VALU100%
+0.33%
PIPR - VALU
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
EVR - VALU
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
MC - VALU
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
LAZ - VALU
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
SF - VALU
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More