SFBQF
Price
$1.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.12B
SGAPY
Price
$23.08
Change
+$0.31 (+1.36%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
32.77B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SFBQF vs SGAPY

Header iconSFBQF vs SGAPY Comparison
Open Charts SFBQF vs SGAPYBanner chart's image
Softbank Group
Price$1.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization53.12B
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$23.08
Change+$0.31 (+1.36%)
Volume$48.81K
Capitalization32.77B
SFBQF vs SGAPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SFBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFBQF vs. SGAPY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFBQF is a Hold and SGAPY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SFBQF: $1.25 vs. SGAPY: $23.08)
Brand notoriety: SFBQF and SGAPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFBQF: 3% vs. SGAPY: 137%
Market capitalization -- SFBQF: $53.12B vs. SGAPY: $32.77B
SFBQF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $53.12B. SGAPY’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $32.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFBQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SFBQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGAPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGAPY is a better buy in the long-term than SFBQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFBQF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGAPY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFBQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SGAPY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBQF is a better buy in the short-term than SGAPY.

Price Growth

SFBQF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +3.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +10.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGAPY is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+10.76% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBQF($53.1B) has a higher market cap than SGAPY($32.8B). SGAPY has higher P/E ratio than SFBQF: SGAPY (19.88) vs SFBQF (14.35). SGAPY YTD gains are higher at: 2.441 vs. SFBQF (-0.943). SFBQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.74T vs. SGAPY (5.57B). SFBQF has more cash in the bank: 2.25T vs. SGAPY (1.67B). SGAPY has less debt than SFBQF: SGAPY (10.9B) vs SFBQF (6.14T). SFBQF has higher revenues than SGAPY: SFBQF (5.91T) vs SGAPY (14.6B).
SFBQFSGAPYSFBQF / SGAPY
Capitalization53.1B32.8B162%
EBITDA1.74T5.57B31,311%
Gain YTD-0.9432.441-39%
P/E Ratio14.3519.8872%
Revenue5.91T14.6B40,493%
Total Cash2.25T1.67B135,132%
Total Debt6.14T10.9B56,284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGAPY: Fundamental Ratings
SGAPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFBQFSGAPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
40%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SFBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ODIIX132.000.94
+0.72%
Invesco Discovery R6
DNLYX59.450.30
+0.51%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Y
MSAAX16.020.08
+0.50%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq C
RYMMX60.670.15
+0.25%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value C
MDILX19.27N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Inv A

SFBQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFBQF and QBCAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFBQF and QBCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBQF
1D Price
Change %
SFBQF100%
N/A
QBCAF - SFBQF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - SFBQF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
PTXKY - SFBQF
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.12%
SGAPY - SFBQF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
SNGNF - SFBQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.99%
More

SGAPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGAPY has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGAPY jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGAPY
1D Price
Change %
SGAPY100%
+1.36%
SKM - SGAPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
RCI - SGAPY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
KT - SGAPY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
TLGPY - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
CHT - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More