SFDL
Price
$30.65
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
95.74M
VALIF
Price
$118.35
Change
+$6.35 (+5.67%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFDL vs VALIF

Header iconSFDL vs VALIF Comparison
Open Charts SFDL vs VALIFBanner chart's image
Security Federal
Price$30.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$853
Capitalization95.74M
Valiant Holding Bern
Price$118.35
Change+$6.35 (+5.67%)
Volume$162
Capitalization2.59B
SFDL vs VALIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFDL vs. VALIF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFDL is a StrongBuy and VALIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (SFDL: $30.65 vs. VALIF: $118.35)
Brand notoriety: SFDL and VALIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFDL: 97% vs. VALIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SFDL: $95.74M vs. VALIF: $2.59B
SFDL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.74M. VALIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFDL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVALIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SFDL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VALIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SFDL and VALIF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFDL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SFDL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

SFDL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while VALIF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VALIF($2.59B) has a higher market cap than SFDL($95.7M). VALIF (10.21) and SFDL (9.79) have similar P/E ratio . SFDL YTD gains are higher at: 14.412 vs. VALIF (5.672). SFDL has less debt than VALIF: SFDL (40.9M) vs VALIF (10.9B). VALIF has higher revenues than SFDL: VALIF (551M) vs SFDL (53M).
SFDLVALIFSFDL / VALIF
Capitalization95.7M2.59B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.4125.672254%
P/E Ratio9.7910.2196%
Revenue53M551M10%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt40.9M10.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFDL: Fundamental Ratings
SFDL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFDLVALIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CESDF5.980.06
+1.08%
CES Energy Solutions Corp.
NXTDF0.39N/A
N/A
NextGen Digital Platforms Inc.
KNCRY17.30N/A
N/A
Konecranes Plc
LGCFF1.58-0.03
-2.17%
Lavras Gold Corp.
DBOEF290.94-8.87
-2.96%
Deutsche Boerse AG

SFDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFDL and BXRBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFDL and BXRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFDL
1D Price
Change %
SFDL100%
N/A
BXRBF - SFDL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNFSF - SFDL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - SFDL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - SFDL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CMGGF - SFDL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VALIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VALIF and LYBC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VALIF and LYBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VALIF
1D Price
Change %
VALIF100%
N/A
LYBC - VALIF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
EDVR - VALIF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
SFDL - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAFN - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
OAKV - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More