SFES
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.04 (-4.82%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.16M
TNYZF
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
144.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFES vs TNYZF

Header iconSFES vs TNYZF Comparison
Open Charts SFES vs TNYZFBanner chart's image
Safeguard Scientifics
Price$0.79
Change-$0.04 (-4.82%)
Volume$500
Capitalization13.16M
Tiny
Price$0.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.5K
Capitalization144.36M
SFES vs TNYZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFES vs. TNYZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFES is a Hold and TNYZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SFES: $0.79 vs. TNYZF: $0.62)
Brand notoriety: SFES and TNYZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFES: 3% vs. TNYZF: 51%
Market capitalization -- SFES: $13.16M vs. TNYZF: $144.36M
SFES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $13.16M. TNYZF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $144.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFES’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNYZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SFES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNYZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNYZF is a better buy in the long-term than SFES.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFES’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNYZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFES’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TNYZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFES is a better buy in the short-term than TNYZF.

Price Growth

SFES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.95% price change this week, while TNYZF (@Investment Managers) price change was -7.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNYZF($144M) has a higher market cap than SFES($13.2M). SFES YTD gains are higher at: -8.712 vs. TNYZF (-44.815). TNYZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.8M vs. SFES (-5.36M). SFES has less debt than TNYZF: SFES (1.25M) vs TNYZF (148M). TNYZF has higher revenues than SFES: TNYZF (192M) vs SFES (0).
SFESTNYZFSFES / TNYZF
Capitalization13.2M144M9%
EBITDA-5.36M17.8M-30%
Gain YTD-8.712-44.81519%
P/E RatioN/A43.04-
Revenue0192M-
Total CashN/A26.7M-
Total Debt1.25M148M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFES: Fundamental Ratings
SFES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFESTNYZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKTAY34.110.46
+1.37%
Makita Corp.
RHHVF344.002.39
+0.70%
Roche Holding Ltd
BAUFF0.12N/A
+0.60%
Blue Star Gold Corp.
ARSUF20.03N/A
N/A
Fagron SA
ESGH5.53N/A
N/A
ESG Inc.

SFES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFES has been loosely correlated with RESCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFES jumps, then RESCU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFES
1D Price
Change %
SFES100%
-5.19%
RESCU - SFES
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IDKFF - SFES
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.69%
AHFCF - SFES
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALTI - SFES
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
TNYZF - SFES
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More

TNYZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNYZF and ALTI have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNYZF and ALTI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNYZF
1D Price
Change %
TNYZF100%
+0.07%
ALTI - TNYZF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
CWD - TNYZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-12.61%
SFES - TNYZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
BAM - TNYZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
PWM - TNYZF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More