Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$14.66
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.18M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. SFGCX (46.2M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.84) vs TEDSX (0.75). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.39 vs. TEDSX (1.97). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.13 vs. SFGCX (15.05).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.053 | 13.395 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.2M | 9.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 0.75 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 1.97 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.68 | 14.16 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.05 | 22.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.27 | 4.90 | 944% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers