Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$13.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.77M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.63
Change+$0.19 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.16B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.16B vs. SFGCX (45.8M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.55) vs TEDSX (0.88). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (26 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX (-0.44) and TEDSX (-0.46) have marching annual gain over last year. TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 31.23 vs. SFGCX (15.63).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.301 | 12.006 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8M | 9.16B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.88 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | -0.46 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.55 | 15.54 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.63 | 31.23 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.91 | -4.03 | -791% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers