Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$14.49
Change-$0.05 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.83M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.62
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.41B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.41B vs. SFGCX (46.8M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.48) vs TEDSX (0.86). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.55 vs. TEDSX (1.65). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.07 vs. SFGCX (15.65).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.076 | 16.209 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.8M | 9.41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.86 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.55 | 1.65 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.15 | 18.63 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.65 | 33.07 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.66 | 10.13 | 510% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers