Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$14.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.68M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.23
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.05B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.05B vs. SFGCX (45.7M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.55) vs TEDSX (0.90). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. TEDSX (3.73). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.74 vs. SFGCX (14.71).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.628 | 11.044 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.7M | 9.05B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.90 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 3.73 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.69 | 9.70 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 29.74 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.13 | -3.24 | -1,055% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement