Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$14.72
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.44M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.49
Change-$0.24 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.49B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.49B vs. SFGCX (47.4M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.85) vs TEDSX (0.85). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. TEDSX (3.09). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 35.30 vs. SFGCX (19.29).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.229 | 16.601 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 9.49B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 0.85 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 3.09 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.98 | 32.05 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.29 | 35.30 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.24 | 9.33 | 528% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement