Ad is loading...
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$13.32
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$30.42
Change-$0.15 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.03B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.04B vs. SFGCX (45M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.75) vs TEDSX (0.94). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (26 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. TEDSX (-1.38). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. SFGCX (26.72).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.680 | 9.227 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45M | 9.04B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 0.94 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.71 | -1.38 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.28 | 5.42 | 319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.72 | 43.50 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.91 | -7.45 | -321% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...