Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFNNX vs TRIGX
SFNNX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts SFNNX vs TRIGX
Schwab Fundamental Intl Equity Index Fd
Price$12.00
Change-$0.07 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.82B
SFNNX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFNNX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFNNX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. SFNNX (3.37B). SFNNX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: SFNNX (3.22) vs TRIGX (2.21). SFNNX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: SFNNX (18 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than SFNNX (0.25). TRIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.90 vs. SFNNX (12.00). SFNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: SFNNX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. SFNNX (10.62). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 111.96 vs. SFNNX (95.36).
| SFNNX | TRIGX | SFNNX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.87 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.87 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.506 | 21.483 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 14.8B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 2.21 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 18.61 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.82 | 55.59 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.36 | 111.96 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.78 | 61.83 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers