SFSHF
Price
$7.59
Change
-$0.05 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jan 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
STGPF
Price
$1.88
Change
-$0.11 (-5.53%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
48.92B
Ad is loading...

SFSHF vs STGPF

Header iconSFSHF vs STGPF Comparison
Open Charts SFSHF vs STGPFBanner chart's image
Safestore Holdings
Price$7.59
Change-$0.05 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization2.48B
Scentre Group
Price$1.88
Change-$0.11 (-5.53%)
Volume$11.17K
Capitalization48.92B
SFSHF vs STGPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
STGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFSHF vs. STGPF commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSHF is a Hold and STGPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (SFSHF: $7.59 vs. STGPF: $1.88)
Brand notoriety: SFSHF and STGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFSHF: 112% vs. STGPF: 107%
Market capitalization -- SFSHF: $2.48B vs. STGPF: $48.92B
SFSHF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.48B. STGPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $48.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTGPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SFSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STGPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFSHF is a better buy in the long-term than STGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STGPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • STGPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

SFSHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while STGPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.41% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STGPF($48.9B) has a higher market cap than SFSHF($2.48B). STGPF has higher P/E ratio than SFSHF: STGPF (47.17) vs SFSHF (6.60). SFSHF YTD gains are higher at: -3.377 vs. STGPF (-5.528). STGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.69B vs. SFSHF (337M). STGPF has more cash in the bank: 679M vs. SFSHF (18.1M). SFSHF has less debt than STGPF: SFSHF (795M) vs STGPF (15.9B). STGPF has higher revenues than SFSHF: STGPF (2.46B) vs SFSHF (222M).
SFSHFSTGPFSFSHF / STGPF
Capitalization2.48B48.9B5%
EBITDA337M1.69B20%
Gain YTD-3.377-5.52861%
P/E Ratio6.6047.1714%
Revenue222M2.46B9%
Total Cash18.1M679M3%
Total Debt795M15.9B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFSHF vs STGPF: Fundamental Ratings
SFSHF
STGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8537
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8474
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFSHF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as STGPF (54). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to STGPF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STGPF (100). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to STGPF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as STGPF (99). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to STGPF’s over the last 12 months.

STGPF's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as SFSHF (84). This means that STGPF’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as STGPF (97). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to STGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFSHFSTGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
STGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWAT12.000.13
+1.10%
Arrow DWA Tactical Macro ETF
BBH165.171.42
+0.87%
VanEck Biotech ETF
LCG31.680.23
+0.72%
Sterling Capital Focus Equity ETF
EBND20.060.05
+0.25%
SPDR® Blmbg Em Mkts Lcl Bd ETF
FBCV32.580.07
+0.20%
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF

SFSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and CIO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and CIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSHF
1D Price
Change %
SFSHF100%
N/A
CIO - SFSHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.37%
BYLOF - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
UNBLF - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
LNSPF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STGPF and MPCMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STGPF and MPCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STGPF
1D Price
Change %
STGPF100%
N/A
MPCMF - STGPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRVGF - STGPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRTF - STGPF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
SFSHF - STGPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLMF - STGPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More