SFSHF
Price
$8.75
Change
-$0.25 (-2.78%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
UNBLF
Price
$100.00
Change
-$2.65 (-2.58%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFSHF vs UNBLF

Header iconSFSHF vs UNBLF Comparison
Open Charts SFSHF vs UNBLFBanner chart's image
Safestore Holdings
Price$8.75
Change-$0.25 (-2.78%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.89B
Unibail-Rodamco SE
Price$100.00
Change-$2.65 (-2.58%)
Volume$1
Capitalization14.72B
SFSHF vs UNBLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFSHF vs. UNBLF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSHF is a Hold and UNBLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SFSHF: $8.75 vs. UNBLF: $100.00)
Brand notoriety: SFSHF and UNBLF are both not notable
SFSHF represents the Miscellaneous Manufacturing, while UNBLF is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFSHF: 133% vs. UNBLF: 1%
Market capitalization -- SFSHF: $1.89B vs. UNBLF: $14.72B
SFSHF [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] is valued at $1.89B. UNBLF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $14.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $104.54B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFSHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNBLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SFSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNBLF is a better buy in the long-term than SFSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFSHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNBLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFSHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UNBLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFSHF is a better buy in the short-term than UNBLF.

Price Growth

SFSHF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UNBLF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+0.09% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.21% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNBLF($14.7B) has a higher market cap than SFSHF($1.89B). UNBLF has higher P/E ratio than SFSHF: UNBLF (16.09) vs SFSHF (4.82). UNBLF YTD gains are higher at: 35.099 vs. SFSHF (11.351). UNBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.36B vs. SFSHF (352M). UNBLF has more cash in the bank: 3.31B vs. SFSHF (16.9M). SFSHF has less debt than UNBLF: SFSHF (1.03B) vs UNBLF (24.7B). UNBLF has higher revenues than SFSHF: UNBLF (3.21B) vs SFSHF (227M).
SFSHFUNBLFSFSHF / UNBLF
Capitalization1.89B14.7B13%
EBITDA352M2.36B15%
Gain YTD11.35135.09932%
P/E Ratio4.8216.0930%
Revenue227M3.21B7%
Total Cash16.9M3.31B1%
Total Debt1.03B24.7B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFSHF vs UNBLF: Fundamental Ratings
SFSHF
UNBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3478
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFSHF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (38). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFSHF (100). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SFSHF (100). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SFSHF (58). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SFSHF (100). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFSHFUNBLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIEQ30.350.20
+0.66%
Principal International Equity ETF
SEMI29.610.18
+0.61%
Columbia Select Technology ETF
JIVE73.510.44
+0.60%
JPMorgan International Value ETF
AESR19.850.06
+0.33%
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF
IEUR67.030.12
+0.18%
iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF

SFSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and BYLOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and BYLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSHF
1D Price
Change %
SFSHF100%
N/A
BYLOF - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNBLF - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSPF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLD - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More

UNBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNBLF and GMRE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNBLF and GMRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNBLF
1D Price
Change %
UNBLF100%
N/A
GMRE - UNBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
PLYM - UNBLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NSA - UNBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
EXR - UNBLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
EPRT - UNBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
More