SFSHF
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.11 (-1.21%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
UNBLF
Price
$99.01
Change
-$1.57 (-1.56%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFSHF vs UNBLF

Header iconSFSHF vs UNBLF Comparison
Open Charts SFSHF vs UNBLFBanner chart's image
Safestore Holdings
Price$9.00
Change-$0.11 (-1.21%)
Volume$250
Capitalization2.48B
Unibail-Rodamco SE
Price$99.01
Change-$1.57 (-1.56%)
Volume$5
Capitalization7.9B
SFSHF vs UNBLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFSHF vs. UNBLF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSHF is a Hold and UNBLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SFSHF: $9.00 vs. UNBLF: $99.01)
Brand notoriety: SFSHF and UNBLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFSHF: 43% vs. UNBLF: 5%
Market capitalization -- SFSHF: $2.48B vs. UNBLF: $7.9B
SFSHF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.48B. UNBLF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $7.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNBLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SFSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UNBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNBLF is a better buy in the long-term than SFSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFSHF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNBLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFSHF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UNBLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFSHF is a better buy in the short-term than UNBLF.

Price Growth

SFSHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UNBLF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.61% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNBLF($7.9B) has a higher market cap than SFSHF($2.48B). UNBLF has higher P/E ratio than SFSHF: UNBLF (42.74) vs SFSHF (6.60). UNBLF YTD gains are higher at: 33.761 vs. SFSHF (14.533). SFSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 337M vs. UNBLF (-76.2M). UNBLF has more cash in the bank: 3.83B vs. SFSHF (18.1M). SFSHF has less debt than UNBLF: SFSHF (795M) vs UNBLF (26.6B). UNBLF has higher revenues than SFSHF: UNBLF (3.11B) vs SFSHF (222M).
SFSHFUNBLFSFSHF / UNBLF
Capitalization2.48B7.9B31%
EBITDA337M-76.2M-442%
Gain YTD14.53333.76143%
P/E Ratio6.6042.7415%
Revenue222M3.11B7%
Total Cash18.1M3.83B0%
Total Debt795M26.6B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFSHF vs UNBLF: Fundamental Ratings
SFSHF
UNBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9487
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
6897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNBLF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SFSHF (56). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFSHF (100). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (97). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SFSHF (55). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (100). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFSHFUNBLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINJX43.260.33
+0.77%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R6
VIMCX60.83N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core I
TEUIX25.98N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price European Stock I
BRSSX14.06-0.03
-0.21%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R2
SHXAX14.56-0.06
-0.41%
American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opps A

SFSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and CIO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and CIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSHF
1D Price
Change %
SFSHF100%
N/A
CIO - SFSHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
BYLOF - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNBLF - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
BTLCY - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
LNSPF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNBLF and GMRE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNBLF and GMRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNBLF
1D Price
Change %
UNBLF100%
-1.56%
GMRE - UNBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
LSGOF - UNBLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
PLYM - UNBLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
PDM - UNBLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
NSA - UNBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More