SFSVF
Price
$89.00
Change
+$24.54 (+38.07%)
Updated
Mar 8 closing price
SWDAF
Price
$38.45
Change
-$0.38 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jun 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

SFSVF vs SWDAF

Header iconSFSVF vs SWDAF Comparison
Open Charts SFSVF vs SWDAFBanner chart's image
Software Service
Price$89.00
Change+$24.54 (+38.07%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Software AG
Price$38.45
Change-$0.38 (-0.98%)
Volume$259
CapitalizationN/A
SFSVF vs SWDAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFSVF vs. SWDAF commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSVF is a Hold and SWDAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SFSVF: $89.00 vs. SWDAF: $38.45)
Brand notoriety: SFSVF and SWDAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFSVF: 100% vs. SWDAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SFSVF: $380.86M vs. SWDAF: $2.53B
SFSVF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $380.86M. SWDAF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFSVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFSVF is a better buy in the long-term than SWDAF.

Price Growth

SFSVF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWDAF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.89% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWDAF($2.54B) has a higher market cap than SFSVF($381M). SWDAF has higher P/E ratio than SFSVF: SWDAF (1111.11) vs SFSVF (12.63). SFSVF YTD gains are higher at: 38.070 vs. SWDAF (3.388). SFSVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.28B vs. SWDAF (148M). SFSVF has more cash in the bank: 8.97B vs. SWDAF (437M). SFSVF has less debt than SWDAF: SFSVF (0) vs SWDAF (285M). SFSVF has higher revenues than SWDAF: SFSVF (31.1B) vs SWDAF (963M).
SFSVFSWDAFSFSVF / SWDAF
Capitalization381M2.54B15%
EBITDA6.28B148M4,241%
Gain YTD38.0703.3881,124%
P/E Ratio12.631111.111%
Revenue31.1B963M3,229%
Total Cash8.97B437M2,053%
Total Debt0285M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWDAF: Fundamental Ratings
SWDAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFSVFSWDAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLD108.87N/A
N/A
PROLOGIS
CLDX26.04-0.16
-0.61%
Celldex Therapeutics
NGVC40.63-0.90
-2.17%
Natural Grocers BY Vitamin Cottage
LSTR179.41-4.20
-2.29%
Landstar System
TOPS5.93-0.20
-3.31%
TOP Ships

SFSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSVF
1D Price
Change %
SFSVF100%
N/A
CRWRF - SFSVF
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SWDAF - SFSVF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMOAF - SFSVF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
XBP - SFSVF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
OVTZ - SFSVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+24.22%
More

SWDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWDAF has been loosely correlated with SFSVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWDAF jumps, then SFSVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWDAF
1D Price
Change %
SWDAF100%
N/A
SFSVF - SWDAF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMOAY - SWDAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAME - SWDAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
CRWRF - SWDAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMICY - SWDAF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More