SG
Price
$14.01
Change
+$0.11 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.64B
61 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$129.14
Change
+$0.78 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.16B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SG vs SHAK

Header iconSG vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts SG vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Sweetgreen
Price$14.01
Change+$0.11 (+0.79%)
Volume$1.58K
Capitalization1.64B
Shake Shack
Price$129.14
Change+$0.78 (+0.61%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization5.16B
SG vs SHAK Comparison Chart
Loading...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SG vs. SHAK commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SG is a StrongBuy and SHAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SG: $13.90 vs. SHAK: $128.36)
Brand notoriety: SG: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SG: 97% vs. SHAK: 129%
Market capitalization -- SG: $1.64B vs. SHAK: $5.16B
SG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.64B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $5.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than SHAK.

Price Growth

SG (@Restaurants) experienced а +8.93% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.31% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($5.16B) has a higher market cap than SG($1.64B). SHAK YTD gains are higher at: -1.109 vs. SG (-56.644). SHAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 125M vs. SG (-21.47M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 313M vs. SG (184M). SG has less debt than SHAK: SG (329M) vs SHAK (824M). SHAK has higher revenues than SG: SHAK (1.28B) vs SG (685M).
SGSHAKSG / SHAK
Capitalization1.64B5.16B32%
EBITDA-21.47M125M-17%
Gain YTD-56.644-1.1095,106%
P/E RatioN/A442.62-
Revenue685M1.28B53%
Total Cash184M313M59%
Total Debt329M824M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
SG
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
525
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8447
SMR RATING
1..100
9286
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHAK's Valuation (98) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SG (84) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (86) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (92) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SG (94) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SG (73) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew significantly faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRFZ39.53N/A
N/A
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
FTAG25.93-0.02
-0.08%
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
DYTA27.75-0.04
-0.14%
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
TLTD82.33-0.15
-0.18%
FlexShares Mstar DevMks exUS FctTilt ETF
HIGH23.92-0.16
-0.66%
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-6.08%
CAVA - SG
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.52%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
CMG - SG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
SHAK - SG
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
RICK - SG
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More