SGBLY
Price
$14.24
Change
-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
22.96B
SNNF
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.56 (+4.90%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
22.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGBLY vs SNNF

Header iconSGBLY vs SNNF Comparison
Open Charts SGBLY vs SNNFBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$14.24
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Volume$36.58K
Capitalization22.96B
Seneca Finl
Price$12.00
Change+$0.56 (+4.90%)
Volume$301
Capitalization22.06M
SGBLY vs SNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGBLY vs. SNNF commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGBLY is a StrongBuy and SNNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (SGBLY: $14.24 vs. SNNF: $12.00)
Brand notoriety: SGBLY and SNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGBLY: 98% vs. SNNF: 12%
Market capitalization -- SGBLY: $22.96B vs. SNNF: $22.06M
SGBLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.96B. SNNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGBLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSNNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SNNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than SNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SNNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNNF is a better buy in the short-term than SGBLY.

Price Growth

SGBLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.05% price change this week, while SNNF (@Regional Banks) price change was +16.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGBLY($23B) has a higher market cap than SNNF($22.1M). SNNF has higher P/E ratio than SGBLY: SNNF (23.40) vs SGBLY (9.08). SNNF YTD gains are higher at: 65.289 vs. SGBLY (26.233).
SGBLYSNNFSGBLY / SNNF
Capitalization23B22.1M104,072%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.23365.28940%
P/E Ratio9.0823.4039%
Revenue196BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt31.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGBLY vs SNNF: Fundamental Ratings
SGBLY
SNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1253
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGBLY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNNF (86). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNNF’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNNF (53). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNNF’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SNNF (7). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to SNNF’s over the last 12 months.

SNNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (46). This means that SNNF’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

SNNF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGBLY (51). This means that SNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGBLYSNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHD27.920.10
+0.36%
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
HTEC30.450.11
+0.36%
Robo Global® Hlthcare Tech & Innovt ETF
LIAJ192.68N/A
N/A
LifeX 2053 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
FAPR43.05-0.06
-0.15%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Apr
EMHC24.96-0.06
-0.22%
SPDR® Bloomberg EM USD Bd ETF

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
-0.32%
NDBKY - SGBLY
66%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
DNBBY - SGBLY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More

SNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNNF and CBKM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNNF and CBKM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNNF
1D Price
Change %
SNNF100%
N/A
CBKM - SNNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVSB - SNNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
SMAL - SNNF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
SGBLY - SNNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
SQCF - SNNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More