SGBLY
Price
$11.96
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
17.82B
SOMC
Price
$19.00
Change
-$0.20 (-1.04%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
84.27M
Ad is loading...

SGBLY vs SOMC

Header iconSGBLY vs SOMC Comparison
Open Charts SGBLY vs SOMCBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$11.96
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$67.03K
Capitalization17.82B
Southern Michigan Ban
Price$19.00
Change-$0.20 (-1.04%)
Volume$200
Capitalization84.27M
SGBLY vs SOMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGBLY vs. SOMC commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGBLY is a Buy and SOMC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (SGBLY: $11.96 vs. SOMC: $19.00)
Brand notoriety: SGBLY and SOMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGBLY: 142% vs. SOMC: 3%
Market capitalization -- SGBLY: $17.82B vs. SOMC: $84.27M
SGBLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.82B. SOMC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $84.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGBLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SOMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than SOMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGBLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

SGBLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while SOMC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

SOMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGBLY($17.8B) has a higher market cap than SOMC($84.3M). SGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 2.222 vs. SOMC (-0.524). SGBLY has higher revenues than SOMC: SGBLY (156B) vs SOMC (31.2M).
SGBLYSOMCSGBLY / SOMC
Capitalization17.8B84.3M21,115%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.222-0.524-424%
P/E Ratio8.90N/A-
Revenue156B31.2M500,000%
Total CashN/A5.8M-
Total DebtN/A33.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGBLY vs SOMC: Fundamental Ratings
SGBLY
SOMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4269
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4974
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOMC's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (50). This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SOMC (69). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to SOMC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SOMC (7). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to SOMC’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (58). This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SOMC (74). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to SOMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIDMX9.280.09
+0.98%
Virtus KAR Developing Markets I
NCVLX12.43-0.02
-0.16%
Nuance Concentrated Value Institutional
GIEZX14.75-0.10
-0.67%
GuideStone Funds International Eq Inv
AZNAX11.27-0.12
-1.05%
Virtus Income & Growth A
ORSAX14.96-0.48
-3.11%
North Square Dynamic Sm Cp A

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
+0.08%
NDBKY - SGBLY
66%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
DNBBY - SGBLY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.56%
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
More

SOMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOMC and FCAP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOMC and FCAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOMC
1D Price
Change %
SOMC100%
N/A
FCAP - SOMC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
FFMR - SOMC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBLY - SOMC
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SUTNY - SOMC
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
SRNN - SOMC
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More