SGBLY
Price
$12.26
Change
+$0.05 (+0.41%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
17.82B
TFC
Price
$37.90
Change
+$0.76 (+2.05%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
52.02B
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SGBLY vs TFC

Header iconSGBLY vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts SGBLY vs TFCBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$12.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
Volume$38.96K
Capitalization17.82B
Truist Financial
Price$37.90
Change+$0.76 (+2.05%)
Volume$8.14M
Capitalization52.02B
SGBLY vs TFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGBLY vs. TFC commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGBLY is a StrongBuy and TFC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (SGBLY: $12.26 vs. TFC: $37.90)
Brand notoriety: SGBLY and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGBLY: 77% vs. TFC: 74%
Market capitalization -- SGBLY: $17.82B vs. TFC: $52.02B
SGBLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.82B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGBLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGBLY’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

SGBLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGBLY is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($52B) has a higher market cap than SGBLY($17.8B). SGBLY has higher P/E ratio than TFC: SGBLY (8.90) vs TFC (7.93). SGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 12.998 vs. TFC (-11.644). SGBLY has higher revenues than TFC: SGBLY (156B) vs TFC (23.4B).
SGBLYTFCSGBLY / TFC
Capitalization17.8B52B34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.998-11.644-112%
P/E Ratio8.907.93112%
Revenue156B23.4B667%
Total CashN/A5.07B-
Total DebtN/A59.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGBLY vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
SGBLY
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1067
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1874
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (54). This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (67). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (3). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (62). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (74). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGBLYTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHPSX17.38N/A
N/A
ProFunds Pharmaceuticals UltraSector Svc
SILLX23.84N/A
N/A
Franklin Global Equity C
PRPDX63.49N/A
N/A
Permanent Portfolio Permanent A
TPISX11.25N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq Premier
MRLIX16.31N/A
N/A
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Z

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
+0.41%
NDBKY - SGBLY
66%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
DNBBY - SGBLY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+2.05%
CFG - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
PNC - TFC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
FITB - TFC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
HBAN - TFC
87%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
FNB - TFC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More