SGBLY
Price
$13.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.15%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
21.93B
TFC
Price
$45.72
Change
-$0.20 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
58.95B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGBLY vs TFC

Header iconSGBLY vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts SGBLY vs TFCBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$13.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
Volume$35.12K
Capitalization21.93B
Truist Financial
Price$45.72
Change-$0.20 (-0.44%)
Volume$9.72M
Capitalization58.95B
SGBLY vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGBLY vs. TFC commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGBLY is a Hold and TFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (SGBLY: $13.75 vs. TFC: $45.92)
Brand notoriety: SGBLY and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGBLY: 95% vs. TFC: 67%
Market capitalization -- SGBLY: $21.93B vs. TFC: $58.95B
SGBLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $21.93B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $58.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGBLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGBLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than SGBLY.

Price Growth

SGBLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($59B) has a higher market cap than SGBLY($21.9B). TFC has higher P/E ratio than SGBLY: TFC (12.39) vs SGBLY (8.64). SGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 30.474 vs. TFC (9.812). SGBLY has higher revenues than TFC: SGBLY (196B) vs TFC (20B).
SGBLYTFCSGBLY / TFC
Capitalization21.9B59B37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.4749.812311%
P/E Ratio8.6412.3970%
Revenue196B20B980%
Total CashN/A5.16B-
Total DebtN/A61.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGBLY vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
SGBLY
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
762
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1268
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5542
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGBLY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (74). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (68). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (4). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (52). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (55). This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGBLYTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEF36.540.66
+1.84%
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
MFSG27.990.13
+0.47%
MFS Active Growth ETF
JRE24.360.02
+0.09%
Janus Henderson US Real Estate ETF
XJUN42.170.02
+0.04%
FT Vest US Eq Enh&Mod Bffr ETF June
XSVM56.38-0.35
-0.62%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momt ETF

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
-0.15%
NDBKY - SGBLY
66%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
DNBBY - SGBLY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More