SGBLY
Price
$11.78
Change
-$0.55 (-4.46%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.82B
TFC
Price
$34.79
Change
-$2.25 (-6.07%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.02B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SGBLY vs TFC

Header iconSGBLY vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts SGBLY vs TFCBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$11.78
Change-$0.55 (-4.46%)
Volume$36.7K
Capitalization17.82B
Truist Financial
Price$34.79
Change-$2.25 (-6.07%)
Volume$207.88K
Capitalization52.02B
SGBLY vs TFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGBLY vs. TFC commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGBLY is a Hold and TFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SGBLY: $11.78 vs. TFC: $37.04)
Brand notoriety: SGBLY and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGBLY: 85% vs. TFC: 217%
Market capitalization -- SGBLY: $17.82B vs. TFC: $52.02B
SGBLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.82B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGBLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGBLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

SGBLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -13.02% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -10.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-4.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($52B) has a higher market cap than SGBLY($17.8B). SGBLY has higher P/E ratio than TFC: SGBLY (8.90) vs TFC (7.93). SGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 0.658 vs. TFC (-13.649). SGBLY has higher revenues than TFC: SGBLY (156B) vs TFC (23.4B).
SGBLYTFCSGBLY / TFC
Capitalization17.8B52B34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.658-13.649-5%
P/E Ratio8.907.93112%
Revenue156B23.4B667%
Total CashN/A5.07B-
Total DebtN/A59.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGBLY vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
SGBLY
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6059
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2474
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3772
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGBLY's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (69). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (74). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (4). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (56). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (72). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGBLYTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDSPX25.93N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv A
ODIYX109.40N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery Y
CCGEX12.03N/A
N/A
Calamos Global Equity C
BMSTX13.86N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R3
WCMYX10.24N/A
N/A
WCM Quality Dividend Growth Inst

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
-4.48%
NDBKY - SGBLY
66%
Closely correlated
-3.62%
DNBBY - SGBLY
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-6.88%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-7.16%
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-10.88%
More