SGBLY
Price
$14.34
Change
+$0.07 (+0.49%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
23.03B
TFC
Price
$44.42
Change
-$0.53 (-1.18%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
57.28B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGBLY vs TFC

Header iconSGBLY vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts SGBLY vs TFCBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$14.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
Volume$21.99K
Capitalization23.03B
Truist Financial
Price$44.42
Change-$0.53 (-1.18%)
Volume$6.88M
Capitalization57.28B
SGBLY vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGBLY vs. TFC commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGBLY is a Buy and TFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SGBLY: $14.34 vs. TFC: $44.42)
Brand notoriety: SGBLY and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGBLY: 64% vs. TFC: 91%
Market capitalization -- SGBLY: $23.03B vs. TFC: $57.28B
SGBLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.03B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $57.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGBLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGBLY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than SGBLY.

Price Growth

SGBLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.38% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($57.3B) has a higher market cap than SGBLY($23B). TFC has higher P/E ratio than SGBLY: TFC (12.04) vs SGBLY (9.04). SGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 27.102 vs. TFC (6.225). SGBLY has higher revenues than TFC: SGBLY (189B) vs TFC (20B).
SGBLYTFCSGBLY / TFC
Capitalization23B57.3B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.1026.225435%
P/E Ratio9.0412.0475%
Revenue189B20B945%
Total CashN/A5.16B-
Total DebtN/A61.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGBLY vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
SGBLY
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1366
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGBLY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (73). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (66). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (4). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (52). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (51). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGBLYTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIJ12.290.16
+1.29%
ProShares UltraShort Industrials
COMP.X48.4449900.608215
+1.27%
Compound cryptocurrency
DEEF34.650.15
+0.42%
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
FIGB43.030.01
+0.02%
Fidelity Investment Grade Bd ETF
FMAR45.72-0.07
-0.15%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Mar

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
+0.46%
NDBKY - SGBLY
66%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
DNBBY - SGBLY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+8.81%
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
More