Advertisement
SGGEF vs SMSZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGGEF is a Buy and SMSZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SGGEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SGGEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SMSZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SGGEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SGGEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SGGEF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.48% price change this week, while SMSZF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +122.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.29%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.79% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.63% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| SGGEF | SMSZF | SGGEF / SMSZF | |
| Capitalization | 13.6B | 867M | 1,569% |
| EBITDA | 598M | 12.6B | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -8.774 | -52.072 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.57 | 17.66 | 173% |
| Revenue | 2.42B | 58.3B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 574M | 16.6B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 1.55B | 5.44B | 29% |
SGGEF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SGGEF | SMSZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 2% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 2% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 66% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 53% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XSVM | 56.73 | 0.55 | +0.98% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momt ETF | |||
| CEF | 35.88 | 0.27 | +0.76% |
| Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | |||
| FLCG | 32.39 | 0.15 | +0.47% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Gr ETF | |||
| CCRV | 20.00 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | |||
| MHF | 7.27 | -0.07 | -0.95% |
| Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund | |||
SGGEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SGGEF and SMTEF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGGEF and SMTEF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGGEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGGEF | 100% | -2.16% | ||
| SMTEF - SGGEF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGPYY - SGGEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| SRCO - SGGEF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HPTO - SGGEF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RWWI - SGGEF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SMSZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSZF and SBIG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSZF and SBIG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMSZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMSZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBIG - SMSZF | 26% Poorly correlated | +7.28% | ||
| VQSSF - SMSZF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGGEF - SMSZF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
| SAPGF - SMSZF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| SMRT - SMSZF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||