SGGEF
Price
$16.39
Change
-$0.41 (-2.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
12.34B
SMSZF
Price
$8.56
Change
+$1.65 (+23.88%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGGEF vs SMSZF

Header iconSGGEF vs SMSZF Comparison
Open Charts SGGEF vs SMSZFBanner chart's image
Sage Group plc (The)
Price$16.39
Change-$0.41 (-2.44%)
Volume$1.66K
Capitalization12.34B
SMS
Price$8.56
Change+$1.65 (+23.88%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.86B
SGGEF vs SMSZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SGGEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGGEF vs. SMSZF commentary
Jul 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGGEF is a Hold and SMSZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SGGEF: $16.39 vs. SMSZF: $8.56)
Brand notoriety: SGGEF and SMSZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGGEF: 67% vs. SMSZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SGGEF: $12.34B vs. SMSZF: $1.86B
SGGEF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.34B. SMSZF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGGEF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SGGEF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMSZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGGEF is a better buy in the long-term than SMSZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGGEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SGGEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

SGGEF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.68% price change this week, while SMSZF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGEF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than SMSZF($1.86B). SMSZF has higher P/E ratio than SGGEF: SMSZF (56.18) vs SGGEF (45.66). SGGEF YTD gains are higher at: 12.839 vs. SMSZF (-52.072). SMSZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.02B vs. SGGEF (422M). SMSZF has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. SGGEF (575M). SGGEF has less debt than SMSZF: SGGEF (1.27B) vs SMSZF (9.33B). SMSZF has higher revenues than SGGEF: SMSZF (44B) vs SGGEF (2.1B).
SGGEFSMSZFSGGEF / SMSZF
Capitalization12.3B1.86B661%
EBITDA422M9.02B5%
Gain YTD12.839-52.072-25%
P/E Ratio45.6656.1881%
Revenue2.1B44B5%
Total Cash575M17.4B3%
Total Debt1.27B9.33B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGGEF: Fundamental Ratings
SGGEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGGEFSMSZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
2%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGGEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCIRX122.12N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info R
NALFX75.61N/A
N/A
New Alternatives A
IWEDX13.98N/A
N/A
Voya Large Cap Value W
GFGEX13.04N/A
N/A
Guardian Fundamental Glb Eq instl
TQCIX19.63N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Equity Institutional

SGGEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGGEF and SMTEF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGGEF and SMTEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGGEF
1D Price
Change %
SGGEF100%
+6.70%
SMTEF - SGGEF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGPYY - SGGEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
SRCO - SGGEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-16.67%
HPTO - SGGEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWWI - SGGEF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

SMSZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSZF and SBIG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSZF and SBIG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSZF
1D Price
Change %
SMSZF100%
N/A
SBIG - SMSZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+11.07%
VQSSF - SMSZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-21.58%
SGGEF - SMSZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.70%
SAPGF - SMSZF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
SMRT - SMSZF
1%
Poorly correlated
+5.50%
More