It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SGHT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZIMV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SGHT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIMV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
SGHT (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +12.58% price change this week, while ZIMV (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.39%.
SGHT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
ZIMV is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| SGHT | ZIMV | SGHT / ZIMV | |
| Capitalization | 276M | 536M | 51% |
| EBITDA | -43.26M | 42.9M | -101% |
| Gain YTD | 45.055 | 36.129 | 125% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 76.3M | 443M | 17% |
| Total Cash | 102M | 70.2M | 145% |
| Total Debt | 40.6M | 235M | 17% |
| SGHT | ZIMV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGHT has been loosely correlated with BLFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGHT jumps, then BLFS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGHT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGHT | 100% | +1.34% | ||
| BLFS - SGHT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| SMTI - SGHT | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| UTMD - SGHT | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| TWST - SGHT | 41% Loosely correlated | +7.16% | ||
| ZIMV - SGHT | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIMV has been closely correlated with VAPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZIMV jumps, then VAPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZIMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIMV | 100% | N/A | ||
| VAPO - ZIMV | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALGN - ZIMV | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| STRRP - ZIMV | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| A - ZIMV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| MTD - ZIMV | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||