Advertisement
SGLFF vs SHECY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGLFF is a Hold and SHECY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SGLFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHECY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SGLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHECY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SGLFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHECY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SGLFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SHECY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
| SGLFF | SHECY | SGLFF / SHECY | |
| Capitalization | 490M | 56.5B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 28.1M | 1.05T | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 2.723 | -8.293 | -33% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.54 | 16.56 | 46% |
| Revenue | 988M | 2.49T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 145M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Total Debt | 232M | 19.8B | 1% |
SGLFF | SHECY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHECY's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLFF (100). This means that SHECY’s stock grew similarly to SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.
SHECY's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLFF (97). This means that SHECY’s stock grew similarly to SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.
SHECY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGLFF (95). This means that SHECY’s stock grew significantly faster than SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.
SGLFF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SHECY (76). This means that SGLFF’s stock grew similarly to SHECY’s over the last 12 months.
SHECY's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLFF (96). This means that SHECY’s stock grew similarly to SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.
| SGLFF | SHECY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
SGLFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLFF and SHECY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLFF and SHECY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGLFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGLFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHECY - SGLFF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| SOMMF - SGLFF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RBTEF - SGLFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PECGF - SGLFF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHWDY - SGLFF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SHECY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHECY has been loosely correlated with NDEKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHECY jumps, then NDEKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHECY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHECY | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| NDEKY - SHECY | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| AVNT - SHECY | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| FUL - SHECY | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| SXYAY - SHECY | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| WLK - SHECY | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.74% | ||
More | ||||