SHALF
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.02 (-3.57%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
WTBDY
Price
$9.86
Change
+$0.16 (+1.65%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.67B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHALF vs WTBDY

Header iconSHALF vs WTBDY Comparison
Open Charts SHALF vs WTBDYBanner chart's image
Shangri-La Asia
Price$0.54
Change-$0.02 (-3.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.06B
Whitbread
Price$9.86
Change+$0.16 (+1.65%)
Volume$7.48K
Capitalization6.67B
SHALF vs WTBDY Comparison Chart in %
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHALF vs. WTBDY commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHALF is a Hold and WTBDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SHALF: $0.54 vs. WTBDY: $9.86)
Brand notoriety: SHALF and WTBDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHALF: 100% vs. WTBDY: 170%
Market capitalization -- SHALF: $2.06B vs. WTBDY: $6.67B
SHALF [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $2.06B. WTBDY’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $6.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $70.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $8.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHALF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBDY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SHALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WTBDY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTBDY is a better buy in the long-term than SHALF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHALF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBDY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHALF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WTBDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SHALF and WTBDY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SHALF (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTBDY (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -8.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+2.97% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTBDY($6.67B) has a higher market cap than SHALF($2.06B). WTBDY has higher P/E ratio than SHALF: WTBDY (20.56) vs SHALF (15.43). WTBDY YTD gains are higher at: 8.286 vs. SHALF (-18.879). WTBDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 957M vs. SHALF (565M). WTBDY has higher revenues than SHALF: WTBDY (2.92B) vs SHALF (2.19B).
SHALFWTBDYSHALF / WTBDY
Capitalization2.06B6.67B31%
EBITDA565M957M59%
Gain YTD-18.8798.286-228%
P/E Ratio15.4320.5675%
Revenue2.19B2.92B75%
Total Cash2.68BN/A-
Total Debt7.81BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHALF vs WTBDY: Fundamental Ratings
SHALF
WTBDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3551
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
9695
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5968
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WTBDY's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (82). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHALF (100). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (96). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (74). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

SHALF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBDY (68). This means that SHALF’s stock grew similarly to WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHALFWTBDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FREL27.710.18
+0.65%
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate ETF
PLTW45.10-0.05
-0.11%
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF
MFM5.38-0.01
-0.19%
MFS Municipal Income Trust
CHPY57.54-0.15
-0.26%
YieldMax Semiconductor Port Opt Inc ETF
PUI47.93-0.16
-0.33%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Utilities Momt ETF

SHALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHALF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHALF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHALF
1D Price
Change %
SHALF100%
N/A
WTBDY - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SKTP - SHALF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHCO - SHALF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
PRSI - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNRIF - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WTBDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBDY has been loosely correlated with ACCYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBDY jumps, then ACCYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBDY
1D Price
Change %
WTBDY100%
+1.65%
ACCYY - WTBDY
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
IHG - WTBDY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
HTHT - WTBDY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
H - WTBDY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
NHHEF - WTBDY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More