SHANF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.18 (+138.46%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
453.17M
TAGP
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
104.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHANF vs TAGP

Header iconSHANF vs TAGP Comparison
Open Charts SHANF vs TAGPBanner chart's image
Shandong Molomg Petroleum Machinery
Price$0.31
Change+$0.18 (+138.46%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization453.17M
Tristar Acquisition Group
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization104.71M
SHANF vs TAGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHANF vs. TAGP commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHANF is a Hold and TAGP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (SHANF: $0.31 vs. TAGP: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: SHANF and TAGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHANF: 183% vs. TAGP: 132%
Market capitalization -- SHANF: $453.17M vs. TAGP: $104.71M
SHANF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $453.17M. TAGP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $104.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHANF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SHANF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TAGP is a better buy in the long-term than SHANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHANF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAGP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHANF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TAGP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHANF is a better buy in the short-term than TAGP.

Price Growth

SHANF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TAGP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.16% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHANF($453M) has a higher market cap than TAGP($105M). TAGP YTD gains are higher at: 104.545 vs. SHANF (36.360). TAGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -58.87K vs. SHANF (-357M). SHANF has more cash in the bank: 568M vs. TAGP (7.39M). TAGP has less debt than SHANF: TAGP (40.3M) vs SHANF (2.16B). SHANF has higher revenues than TAGP: SHANF (2.61B) vs TAGP (0).
SHANFTAGPSHANF / TAGP
Capitalization453M105M431%
EBITDA-357M-58.87K606,384%
Gain YTD36.360104.54535%
P/E Ratio14.49N/A-
Revenue2.61B0-
Total Cash568M7.39M7,690%
Total Debt2.16B40.3M5,365%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHANF vs TAGP: Fundamental Ratings
SHANF
TAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3742
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAGP's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHANF (56). This means that TAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHANF’s over the last 12 months.

SHANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that SHANF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SHANF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that SHANF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SHANF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (36). This means that SHANF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SHANF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that SHANF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHANFTAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHWX10.890.09
+0.83%
Artisan Value Income Institutional
DPLGX27.60N/A
N/A
Jackson Square Large-Cap Growth IS
MVALX41.36N/A
N/A
Meridian Contrarian Legacy
FDFIX26.53N/A
N/A
Fidelity Flex 500 Index
MSCQX11.21N/A
N/A
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity I

SHANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHANF and SBFFY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHANF and SBFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHANF
1D Price
Change %
SHANF100%
N/A
SBFFY - SHANF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFFF - SHANF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAGP - SHANF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBOEF - SHANF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBOEY - SHANF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAGP and MRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAGP and MRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAGP
1D Price
Change %
TAGP100%
N/A
MRC - TAGP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
QSEP - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
SAPMY - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYGPY - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
TOLWF - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.29%
More