SHASF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
521.8M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOCLF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.03 (+11.11%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
110.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHASF vs SOCLF

Header iconSHASF vs SOCLF Comparison
Open Charts SHASF vs SOCLFBanner chart's image
Shamaran Petroleum
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization521.8M
Pharos Energy
Price$0.30
Change+$0.03 (+11.11%)
Volume$11.5K
Capitalization110.74M
SHASF vs SOCLF Comparison Chart in %
SHASF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOCLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHASF vs. SOCLF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHASF is a Hold and SOCLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (SHASF: $0.19 vs. SOCLF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: SHASF and SOCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHASF: 2% vs. SOCLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SHASF: $483.01M vs. SOCLF: $110.71M
SHASF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $483.01M. SOCLF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $110.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $108.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHASF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSOCLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SHASF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SOCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SHASF and SOCLF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHASF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOCLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SOCLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOCLF is a better buy in the short-term than SHASF.

Price Growth

SHASF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +5.16% price change this week, while SOCLF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.91% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHASF($522M) has a higher market cap than SOCLF($111M). SOCLF has higher P/E ratio than SHASF: SOCLF (30.00) vs SHASF (5.63). SHASF YTD gains are higher at: 119.289 vs. SOCLF (19.665).
SHASFSOCLFSHASF / SOCLF
Capitalization522M111M470%
EBITDA161MN/A-
Gain YTD119.28919.665607%
P/E Ratio5.6330.0019%
Revenue135MN/A-
Total Cash67.2MN/A-
Total Debt158MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHASF vs SOCLF: Fundamental Ratings
SHASF
SOCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2746
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1447
SMR RATING
1..100
2058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOCLF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SHASF (58). This means that SOCLF’s stock grew similarly to SHASF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOCLF (47). This means that SHASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOCLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOCLF (58). This means that SHASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOCLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SOCLF (50). This means that SHASF’s stock grew similarly to SOCLF’s over the last 12 months.

SOCLF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SHASF (5). This means that SOCLF’s stock grew similarly to SHASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHASFSOCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHASF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOCLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGNCX15.110.04
+0.27%
Macquarie Natural Resources C
LGPSX40.90N/A
N/A
ProFunds Large Cap Growth Svc
AGORX10.69N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Global Gr R
AFGFX90.40N/A
N/A
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth R6
HGORX64.22-0.72
-1.11%
Hartford Growth Opportunities R3

SHASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHASF and PMOIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHASF and PMOIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHASF
1D Price
Change %
SHASF100%
N/A
PMOIF - SHASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STGAF - SHASF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QTEYF - SHASF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQZZF - SHASF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPND - SHASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOCLF and STOSF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOCLF and STOSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOCLF
1D Price
Change %
SOCLF100%
N/A
STOSF - SOCLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
SQZZF - SOCLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPND - SOCLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STGAF - SOCLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHASF - SOCLF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More