SHERF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
44.97M
SHVLF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.02 (-8.70%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHERF vs SHVLF

Header iconSHERF vs SHVLF Comparison
Open Charts SHERF vs SHVLFBanner chart's image
Sherritt International
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization44.97M
Starcore International Mines
Price$0.21
Change-$0.02 (-8.70%)
Volume$45K
Capitalization13.33M
SHERF vs SHVLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHERF vs. SHVLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHERF is a Hold and SHVLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SHERF: $0.09 vs. SHVLF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: SHERF and SHVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHERF: 117% vs. SHVLF: 56%
Market capitalization -- SHERF: $44.97M vs. SHVLF: $13.33M
SHERF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $44.97M. SHVLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHERF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHVLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SHERF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHVLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHVLF is a better buy in the long-term than SHERF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHERF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHVLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHERF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHVLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHERF is a better buy in the short-term than SHVLF.

Price Growth

SHERF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -11.54% price change this week, while SHVLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHERF($45M) has a higher market cap than SHVLF($13.3M). SHVLF YTD gains are higher at: 155.474 vs. SHERF (-13.043).
SHERFSHVLFSHERF / SHVLF
Capitalization45M13.3M338%
EBITDA1.4MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.043155.474-8%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue161MN/A-
Total Cash17.8MN/A-
Total Debt324MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHERF vs SHVLF: Fundamental Ratings
SHERF
SHVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
9493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHERF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SHVLF (51). This means that SHERF’s stock grew similarly to SHVLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SHERF (100). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to SHERF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SHERF (94). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to SHERF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHERF (85). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHERF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHERF (100). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew significantly faster than SHERF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHERFSHVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRPOF0.81N/A
N/A
GRUPO TRAXION S A B DE C V
RIGMF0.11N/A
N/A
Ridgestone Mining Inc.
DROOF2.28N/A
N/A
Deliveroo PLC
WEICF1.92N/A
N/A
Weichai Power Company Ltd.
LWCL40.00N/A
N/A
Lewis & Clark BANCORP

SHERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHERF has been loosely correlated with BENZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHERF jumps, then BENZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHERF
1D Price
Change %
SHERF100%
N/A
BENZF - SHERF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMRZF - SHERF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.85%
ARSMF - SHERF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
HUSIF - SHERF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
KNGRF - SHERF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More

SHVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHVLF and SBWFF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHVLF and SBWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHVLF
1D Price
Change %
SHVLF100%
-8.70%
SBWFF - SHVLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILEF - SHVLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
SHERF - SHVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKMSF - SHVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTPPF - SHVLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More