SHMUF
Price
$11.31
Change
+$5.49 (+94.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.63B
SKSBF
Price
$25.35
Change
-$0.65 (-2.50%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
10.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHMUF vs SKSBF

Header iconSHMUF vs SKSBF Comparison
Open Charts SHMUF vs SKSBFBanner chart's image
Shimizu
Price$11.31
Change+$5.49 (+94.33%)
Volume$300
Capitalization9.63B
Skanska AB
Price$25.35
Change-$0.65 (-2.50%)
Volume$6.21K
Capitalization10.52B
SHMUF vs SKSBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHMUF vs. SKSBF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHMUF is a Hold and SKSBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SHMUF: $11.31 vs. SKSBF: $25.35)
Brand notoriety: SHMUF and SKSBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHMUF: 98% vs. SKSBF: 107%
Market capitalization -- SHMUF: $9.63B vs. SKSBF: $10.44B
SHMUF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $9.63B. SKSBF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $10.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHMUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKSBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SHMUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKSBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHMUF is a better buy in the long-term than SKSBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHMUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKSBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHMUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SKSBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKSBF is a better buy in the short-term than SHMUF.

Price Growth

SHMUF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SKSBF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +335.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.94% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKSBF($10.5B) has a higher market cap than SHMUF($9.63B). SHMUF has higher P/E ratio than SKSBF: SHMUF (17.61) vs SKSBF (15.94). SHMUF YTD gains are higher at: 94.464 vs. SKSBF (23.840). SHMUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.3B vs. SKSBF (8.64B). SHMUF has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. SKSBF (26.3B). SKSBF has less debt than SHMUF: SKSBF (6.79B) vs SHMUF (575B). SHMUF has higher revenues than SKSBF: SHMUF (1.91T) vs SKSBF (185B).
SHMUFSKSBFSHMUF / SKSBF
Capitalization9.63B10.5B92%
EBITDA64.3B8.64B744%
Gain YTD94.46423.840396%
P/E Ratio17.6115.94111%
Revenue1.91T185B1,030%
Total Cash286B26.3B1,087%
Total Debt575B6.79B8,471%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHMUF vs SKSBF: Fundamental Ratings
SHMUF
SKSBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4492
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4779
SMR RATING
1..100
10069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SKSBF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SHMUF (58). This means that SKSBF’s stock grew similarly to SHMUF’s over the last 12 months.

SHMUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SKSBF (79). This means that SHMUF’s stock grew similarly to SKSBF’s over the last 12 months.

SKSBF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SHMUF (100). This means that SKSBF’s stock grew similarly to SHMUF’s over the last 12 months.

SHMUF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SKSBF (51). This means that SHMUF’s stock grew similarly to SKSBF’s over the last 12 months.

SKSBF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHMUF (100). This means that SKSBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHMUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHMUFSKSBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAAU36.990.16
+0.43%
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
LSVD27.97N/A
N/A
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
CPZ16.36-0.03
-0.21%
Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust
AFK23.75-0.08
-0.34%
VanEck Africa ETF
BTOP35.65-1.80
-4.81%
Bitwise Trendwise BTC/ETH and Treasuries

SKSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKSBF and SNCAF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKSBF and SNCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKSBF
1D Price
Change %
SKSBF100%
N/A
SNCAF - SKSBF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
SKBSY - SKSBF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
SHMUF - SKSBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNOCF - SKSBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMUY - SKSBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More