Ad is loading...
SHNWF
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
STCGF
Price
$7.32
Change
-$0.18 (-2.40%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

SHNWF vs STCGF

Header iconSHNWF vs STCGF Comparison
Open Charts SHNWF vs STCGFBanner chart's image
Schroders
Price$4.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
STACK CAP GROUP
Price$7.32
Change-$0.18 (-2.40%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
SHNWF vs STCGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHNWF vs. STCGF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHNWF is a Hold and STCGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SHNWF: $4.00 vs. STCGF: $7.32)
Brand notoriety: SHNWF and STCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHNWF: 275% vs. STCGF: 50%
Market capitalization -- SHNWF: $7.9B vs. STCGF: $46.75M
SHNWF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $7.9B. STCGF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $46.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHNWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTCGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SHNWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the long-term than STCGF.

Price Growth

SHNWF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.91% price change this week, while STCGF (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.35% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHNWF($7.9B) has a higher market cap than STCGF($46.8M). STCGF YTD gains are higher at: 10.872 vs. SHNWF (-27.273).
SHNWFSTCGFSHNWF / STCGF
Capitalization7.9B46.8M16,889%
EBITDAN/A-12.23M-
Gain YTD-27.27310.872-251%
P/E Ratio12.05N/A-
RevenueN/A1.09M-
Total CashN/A28.7M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEMEX17.220.04
+0.23%
Franklin Mutual Beacon C
BSCRX16.37-0.05
-0.30%
Brandes Small Cap Value R6
MFLLX14.36-0.06
-0.42%
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception R6
RNTTX43.01-0.18
-0.42%
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts M
MEGBX148.20-3.30
-2.18%
MFS Growth B

SHNWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHNWF and STT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHNWF and STT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHNWF
1D Price
Change %
SHNWF100%
N/A
STT - SHNWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
FNCSF - SHNWF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
BAM - SHNWF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
BBUC - SHNWF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
GAMI - SHNWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More

STCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STCGF and BUR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STCGF and BUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STCGF
1D Price
Change %
STCGF100%
-2.40%
BUR - STCGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
BCBNF - STCGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
MONTF - STCGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENDI - STCGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
SHNWF - STCGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More