Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs XLK
SHOC vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs XLK
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$65.68
Change+$3.11 (+4.97%)
Volume$11.85K
Net Assets124.49M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$279.71
Change+$6.51 (+2.38%)
Volume$10.06M
Net Assets89.16B
SHOC vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. XLK commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 89.2B vs. SHOC (124M). SHOC has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: SHOC (43.408) vs XLK (20.861). SHOC was incepted earlier than XLK: SHOC (3 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). XLK has a higher turnover SHOC (25.00) vs SHOC (25.00).
| SHOC | XLK | SHOC / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 43.408 | 20.861 | 208% |
| Net Assets | 124M | 89.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.08 | 500% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 39.00 | 64% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.50 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IWML | 22.23 | 0.64 | +2.94% |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Fctr TR ETN | |||
| VIOO | 109.02 | 1.43 | +1.33% |
| Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | |||
| GSEE | 55.74 | 0.70 | +1.27% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF | |||
| EMHY | 40.27 | 0.11 | +0.27% |
| iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yld Bd ETF | |||
| VGUS | 75.62 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF | |||
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +4.97% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 87% Closely correlated | +5.42% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 87% Closely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| NVDA - SHOC | 85% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | +3.08% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | +4.29% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +2.38% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +5.42% | ||
| TRMB - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | +2.36% | ||
More | ||||