SHPMY
Price
$8.30
Change
+$1.01 (+13.85%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.46B
SHTDF
Price
$2.36
Change
+$0.21 (+9.77%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHPMY vs SHTDF

Header iconSHPMY vs SHTDF Comparison
Open Charts SHPMY vs SHTDFBanner chart's image
Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Price$8.30
Change+$1.01 (+13.85%)
Volume$143
Capitalization8.46B
Sinopharm Group
Price$2.36
Change+$0.21 (+9.77%)
Volume$110
Capitalization7.37B
SHPMY vs SHTDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHPMY vs. SHTDF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHPMY is a Buy and SHTDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SHPMY: $8.30 vs. SHTDF: $2.36)
Brand notoriety: SHPMY and SHTDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHPMY: 30% vs. SHTDF: 8%
Market capitalization -- SHPMY: $8.46B vs. SHTDF: $7.37B
SHPMY [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $8.46B. SHTDF’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $7.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $91.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHPMY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHTDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SHPMY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHTDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHTDF is a better buy in the long-term than SHPMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHPMY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHTDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHPMY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SHTDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHPMY is a better buy in the short-term than SHTDF.

Price Growth

SHPMY (@Medical Distributors) experienced а +12.16% price change this week, while SHTDF (@Medical Distributors) price change was +0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (+1.02% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHPMY($8.46B) has a higher market cap than SHTDF($7.37B). SHTDF has higher P/E ratio than SHPMY: SHTDF (7.68) vs SHPMY (7.20). SHPMY YTD gains are higher at: 2.349 vs. SHTDF (-5.418).
SHPMYSHTDFSHPMY / SHTDF
Capitalization8.46B7.37B115%
EBITDA14.2BN/A-
Gain YTD2.349-5.418-43%
P/E Ratio7.207.6894%
Revenue277BN/A-
Total Cash47.5BN/A-
Total Debt55.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHPMY vs SHTDF: Fundamental Ratings
SHPMY
SHTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9589
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
7657
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHTDF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHPMY (69). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SHPMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as SHTDF (100). This means that SHPMY’s stock grew similarly to SHTDF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTDF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SHPMY (76). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew similarly to SHPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SHPMY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SHTDF (61). This means that SHPMY’s stock grew similarly to SHTDF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTDF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHPMY (72). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHPMYSHTDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FISR26.01-0.03
-0.11%
SPDR® SSGA Fixed Inc Sect Rotation ETF
SUSC23.48-0.05
-0.21%
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
IEMG65.38-0.32
-0.49%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
IYY160.47-0.86
-0.53%
iShares Dow Jones US ETF
HQGO58.40-0.36
-0.62%
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF

SHPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHPMY and NSVGF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHPMY and NSVGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHPMY
1D Price
Change %
SHPMY100%
N/A
NSVGF - SHPMY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSM - SHPMY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHTDF - SHPMY
12%
Poorly correlated
+9.54%
ZYXI - SHPMY
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
SHPMF - SHPMY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHTDF and SHTDY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHTDF and SHTDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHTDF
1D Price
Change %
SHTDF100%
+9.54%
SHTDY - SHTDF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
COR - SHTDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
SHPMY - SHTDF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAH - SHTDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
AHG - SHTDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More