Ad is loading...
SICNX vs VFWPX
SICNX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts SICNX vs VFWPX
Schwab® International Core Equity
Price$12.67
Change-$0.34 (-2.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets678.24M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$127.16
Change-$3.02 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.24B
SICNX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SICNX vs. VFWPX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SICNX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.2B vs. SICNX (678M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than SICNX: VFWPX (3.08) vs SICNX (2.41). SICNX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: SICNX (17 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). SICNX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). SICNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). SICNX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: SICNX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). SICNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.04 vs. VFWPX (7.48). SICNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.06 vs. VFWPX (34.31).
| SICNX | VFWPX | SICNX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.03 | 2,867% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.543 | 8.719 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 678M | 59.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 3.08 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.04 | 7.48 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.01 | 19.39 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.06 | 34.31 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.70 | 41.25 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers