Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SIDNX vs TRIGX
SIDNX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts SIDNX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val I
Price$13.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.54
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.38B
SIDNX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SIDNX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIDNX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. SIDNX (2.52B). SIDNX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: SIDNX (2.63) vs TRIGX (2.05). SIDNX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: SIDNX (19 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). SIDNX (0.87) and TRIGX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . SIDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). SIDNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: SIDNX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). SIDNX (29.52) and TRIGX (28.34) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.63 vs. SIDNX (79.42).
| SIDNX | TRIGX | SIDNX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.851 | 32.254 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 16.4B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.05 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.52 | 28.34 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.81 | 74.36 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.42 | 98.63 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.37 | 86.24 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers