SIETY vs SIEVF
To understand the difference between D`ieteren Group - ADR (SIETY) vs. D`ieteren Group (SIEVF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SIETY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSIEVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SIETY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SIEVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SIETY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIEVF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SIETY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SIEVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
SIETY (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +17.11% price change this week, while SIEVF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.29%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+1.91% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| SIETY | SIEVF | SIETY / SIEVF | |
| Capitalization | 9.29B | 9.29B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 520M | 350M | 149% |
| Gain YTD | 17.113 | -0.848 | -2,017% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.47 | 26.04 | 105% |
| Revenue | 4.72B | 3.38B | 140% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 876M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 200M | - |
SIETY | SIEVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SIEVF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (20). This means that SIEVF’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SIEVF (29). This means that SIETY’s stock grew similarly to SIEVF’s over the last 12 months.
SIEVF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (92). This means that SIEVF’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIEVF (84). This means that SIETY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIEVF’s over the last 12 months.
SIEVF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (77). This means that SIEVF’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
| SIETY | SIEVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 44% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 40% | 12 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 27% | 12 days ago 34% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 17% | 12 days ago 27% |
SIETY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIETY and CARG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIETY and CARG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIETY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIETY | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| CARG - SIETY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| KMX - SIETY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| BBWI - SIETY | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| PAG - SIETY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| SIEVF - SIETY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SIEVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIEVF and MRGO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIEVF and MRGO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIEVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRGO - SIEVF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIETY - SIEVF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| UXIN - SIEVF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.41% | ||
| WFAFY - SIEVF | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.49% | ||
| TLF - SIEVF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||