SIRZF
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
82.48M
SSPPF
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.07 (+3.37%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SIRZF vs SSPPF

Header iconSIRZF vs SSPPF Comparison
Open Charts SIRZF vs SSPPFBanner chart's image
Sir Rty Income Fund
Price$9.90
Change-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization82.48M
SSP Group
Price$2.15
Change+$0.07 (+3.37%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization2.05B
SIRZF vs SSPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SIRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SIRZF vs. SSPPF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIRZF is a Hold and SSPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SIRZF: $9.90 vs. SSPPF: $2.15)
Brand notoriety: SIRZF and SSPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SIRZF: 27% vs. SSPPF: 136%
Market capitalization -- SIRZF: $82.48M vs. SSPPF: $2.05B
SIRZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $82.48M. SSPPF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SIRZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSSPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SIRZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SSPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIRZF is a better buy in the long-term than SSPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SIRZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSPPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SIRZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SSPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSPPF is a better buy in the short-term than SIRZF.

Price Growth

SIRZF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSPPF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

SSPPF is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSPPF($2.05B) has a higher market cap than SIRZF($82.5M). SSPPF has higher P/E ratio than SIRZF: SSPPF (46.06) vs SIRZF (10.80). SIRZF YTD gains are higher at: 9.960 vs. SSPPF (-15.686). SSPPF has higher revenues than SIRZF: SSPPF (3.58B) vs SIRZF (14.9M).
SIRZFSSPPFSIRZF / SSPPF
Capitalization82.5M2.05B4%
EBITDAN/A588M-
Gain YTD9.960-15.686-63%
P/E Ratio10.8046.0623%
Revenue14.9M3.58B0%
Total CashN/A207M-
Total DebtN/A2.11B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SIRZF vs SSPPF: Fundamental Ratings
SIRZF
SSPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9646
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28100
SMR RATING
1..100
6096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5276
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIRZF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSPPF (92). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew significantly faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSPPF (100). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew significantly faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSPPF (96). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SSPPF (76). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew similarly to SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSPPF (99). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew significantly faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SIRZFSSPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SIRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOPCX19.270.17
+0.89%
NYLI WMC Small Companies Class C
VLAAX42.560.32
+0.76%
Value Line Asset Allocation Investor
MVCCX28.92N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Value C
CRBRX13.35N/A
N/A
Columbia Acorn Inst2
WALSX13.65N/A
N/A
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Investor

SIRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIRZF and HELFY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIRZF and HELFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIRZF
1D Price
Change %
SIRZF100%
N/A
HELFY - SIRZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
KRIUF - SIRZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - SIRZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTBRF - SIRZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBGI - SIRZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SSPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSPPF and PZRIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSPPF and PZRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSPPF
1D Price
Change %
SSPPF100%
N/A
PZRIF - SSPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
BROS - SSPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
FWRG - SSPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
SIRZF - SSPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSSF - SSPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More