SITKF
Price
$0.90
Change
+$0.06 (+7.14%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
351.06M
SRCRF
Price
$0.29
Change
+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
63.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SITKF vs SRCRF

Header iconSITKF vs SRCRF Comparison
Open Charts SITKF vs SRCRFBanner chart's image
Sitka Gold
Price$0.90
Change+$0.06 (+7.14%)
Volume$330.41K
Capitalization351.06M
Scorpio Gold
Price$0.29
Change+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Volume$59.35K
Capitalization63.22M
SITKF vs SRCRF Comparison Chart in %
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SITKF vs. SRCRF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SITKF is a StrongBuy and SRCRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SITKF: $0.90 vs. SRCRF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: SITKF and SRCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SITKF: 161% vs. SRCRF: 23%
Market capitalization -- SITKF: $351.06M vs. SRCRF: $63.22M
SITKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $351.06M. SRCRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $63.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $110.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SITKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SITKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRCRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SITKF is a better buy in the long-term than SRCRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SITKF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SITKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SRCRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SITKF is a better buy in the short-term than SRCRF.

Price Growth

SITKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +18.45% price change this week, while SRCRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6138.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SITKF($351M) has a higher market cap than SRCRF($63.2M). SRCRF YTD gains are higher at: 311.991 vs. SITKF (258.760). SITKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.82M vs. SRCRF (-15.36M). SITKF has more cash in the bank: 22.3M vs. SRCRF (585K). SITKF (0) and SRCRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SITKFSRCRFSITKF / SRCRF
Capitalization351M63.2M555%
EBITDA-3.82M-15.36M25%
Gain YTD258.760311.99183%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash22.3M585K3,812%
Total DebtN/A522K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SITKF vs SRCRF: Fundamental Ratings
SITKF
SRCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SITKF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCRF (76). This means that SITKF’s stock grew similarly to SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SITKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRCRF (100). This means that SITKF’s stock grew significantly faster than SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SITKF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCRF (100). This means that SITKF’s stock grew similarly to SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SITKF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCRF (35). This means that SITKF’s stock grew similarly to SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCRF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SITKF (100). This means that SRCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than SITKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SITKFSRCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWLLF2.18N/A
N/A
Great Wall Motor Company, Ltd.
TUIFF9.00N/A
N/A
TUI AG
NUVR12.25-0.30
-2.39%
Nuvera Communications, Inc.
PRLPF19.50-0.98
-4.77%
PROPEL HLDGS INC.
XTMIF0.02N/A
-14.29%
XTM Inc.

SITKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SITKF and SRCRF have been poorly correlated (+-5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SITKF and SRCRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SITKF
1D Price
Change %
SITKF100%
+7.76%
SRCRF - SITKF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
SROYF - SITKF
-8%
Poorly correlated
-3.80%

SRCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRCRF has been loosely correlated with VGMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRCRF jumps, then VGMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCRF
1D Price
Change %
SRCRF100%
+1.60%
VGMIF - SRCRF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SROYF - SRCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.80%
SITKF - SRCRF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+7.76%