SJMHF
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.85B
SJMHY
Price
$1.59
Change
+$0.61 (+62.24%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SJMHF vs SJMHY

Header iconSJMHF vs SJMHY Comparison
Open Charts SJMHF vs SJMHYBanner chart's image
SJM Holdings
Price$0.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.17K
Capitalization2.85B
SJM Holdings
Price$1.59
Change+$0.61 (+62.24%)
Volume$472
Capitalization2.85B
SJMHF vs SJMHY Comparison Chart in %
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SJMHF vs. SJMHY commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To understand the difference between SJM Holdings Limited (SJMHF) vs. SJM Holdings Limited - ADR (SJMHY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SJMHF: $0.36 vs. SJMHY: $1.59)
Brand notoriety: SJMHF and SJMHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SJMHF: 190% vs. SJMHY: 19%
Market capitalization -- SJMHF: $2.85B vs. SJMHY: $2.85B
SJMHF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $2.85B. SJMHY’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $35.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SJMHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJMHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SJMHF and SJMHY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SJMHF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SJMHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SJMHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the short-term than SJMHY.

Price Growth

SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SJMHY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +61.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.35% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SJMHF($2.85B) and SJMHY($2.85B) have the same market capitalization . SJMHF has higher P/E ratio than SJMHY: SJMHF (8460.39) vs SJMHY (6576.19). SJMHY YTD gains are higher at: 26.190 vs. SJMHF (10.922).
SJMHFSJMHYSJMHF / SJMHY
Capitalization2.85B2.85B100%
EBITDAN/A1.93B-
Gain YTD10.92226.19042%
P/E Ratio8460.396576.19129%
RevenueN/A13.1B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SJMHF vs SJMHY: Fundamental Ratings
SJMHF
SJMHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4695
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SJMHF's Valuation (99) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHY (99). This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHY’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHY (100). This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHY’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHY (100). This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHY’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (50). This means that SJMHY’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHY (26). This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SJMHFSJMHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANBX51.29N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Balanced D
CGTYX100.28N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst3
TSPFX5.97N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Growth R4
OANWX26.33-0.16
-0.60%
Oakmark Global Select Institutional
PIVYX49.09-0.50
-1.01%
Putnam International Small Cap Y

SJMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHF
1D Price
Change %
SJMHF100%
N/A
SJMHY - SJMHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SJMHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
SCHYF - SJMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLCO - SJMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
WYNN - SJMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More

SJMHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHY has been loosely correlated with SJMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHY jumps, then SJMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHY
1D Price
Change %
SJMHY100%
N/A
SJMHF - SJMHY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WYNMY - SJMHY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
SCHYY - SJMHY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
WYNN - SJMHY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
WYNMF - SJMHY
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.29%
More