Advertisement
SKSJF vs SPRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKSJF is a Hold and SPRS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SKSJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPRS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SKSJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SPRS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SPRS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SPRS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
SKSJF (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPRS (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) price change was +7.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliance Stores industry was +1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.54%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliance Stores (+1.90% weekly)The electronics/appliance stores industry includes companies that sell consumer electronics such as computers, stereo components, software, TVs, and appliances such as those for cooking and cleaning. Some companies also operate stores that rent and sell pre-recorded CDs and DVDs. Best Buy Co., Inc., Conn’s, Inc., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores Inc. and Trans World Entertainment Corp. are some of the largest companies in this space.
| SKSJF | SPRS | SKSJF / SPRS | |
| Capitalization | 204M | 15.1M | 1,351% |
| EBITDA | 2.49B | 1.37M | 182,370% |
| Gain YTD | 7.072 | 15.217 | 46% |
| P/E Ratio | 61.11 | 17.67 | 346% |
| Revenue | 147B | 33M | 445,455% |
| Total Cash | 17.2B | 12.8M | 134,375% |
| Total Debt | 10.7B | 1.06M | 1,011,342% |
SKSJF | SPRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SKSJF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as SPRS (49). This means that SKSJF’s stock grew similarly to SPRS’s over the last 12 months.
SPRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKSJF (100). This means that SPRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKSJF’s over the last 12 months.
SKSJF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as SPRS (86). This means that SKSJF’s stock grew similarly to SPRS’s over the last 12 months.
SPRS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SKSJF (56). This means that SPRS’s stock grew similarly to SKSJF’s over the last 12 months.
SKSJF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPRS (100). This means that SKSJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPRS’s over the last 12 months.
| SKSJF | SPRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 7% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 4% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
Advertisement
SKSJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SKSJF and RXEEY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKSJF and RXEEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SKSJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKSJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RXEEY - SKSJF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| RXLSF - SKSJF | 7% Poorly correlated | +6.74% | ||
| PGNT - SKSJF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| EACO - SKSJF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPRS - SKSJF | -0% Poorly correlated | +7.72% | ||
More | ||||
SPRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPRS and PGNT have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPRS and PGNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPRS | 100% | +7.72% | ||
| PGNT - SPRS | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| RXEEY - SPRS | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| EACO - SPRS | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IZM - SPRS | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| SKSJF - SPRS | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||