SLFPF
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.06 (-2.30%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
STJPF
Price
$16.10
Change
+$0.26 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLFPF vs STJPF

Header iconSLFPF vs STJPF Comparison
Open Charts SLFPF vs STJPFBanner chart's image
ABRDN
Price$2.55
Change-$0.06 (-2.30%)
Volume$3.4K
Capitalization5.79B
St. James Place Capital
Price$16.10
Change+$0.26 (+1.64%)
Volume$150
Capitalization6.63B
SLFPF vs STJPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLFPF vs. STJPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLFPF is a Hold and STJPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SLFPF: $2.55 vs. STJPF: $16.10)
Brand notoriety: SLFPF and STJPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLFPF: 270% vs. STJPF: 33%
Market capitalization -- SLFPF: $5.79B vs. STJPF: $6.63B
SLFPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.79B. STJPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLFPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTJPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLFPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STJPF is a better buy in the long-term than SLFPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLFPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STJPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLFPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STJPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STJPF is a better buy in the short-term than SLFPF.

Price Growth

SLFPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.04% price change this week, while STJPF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

STJPF is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($6.63B) has a higher market cap than SLFPF($5.79B). STJPF has higher P/E ratio than SLFPF: STJPF (16.00) vs SLFPF (7.54). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 83.163 vs. SLFPF (44.068). STJPF has more cash in the bank: 6.68B vs. SLFPF (1.34B). STJPF has less debt than SLFPF: STJPF (316M) vs SLFPF (707M). STJPF has higher revenues than SLFPF: STJPF (12.4B) vs SLFPF (2.31B).
SLFPFSTJPFSLFPF / STJPF
Capitalization5.79B6.63B87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.06883.16353%
P/E Ratio7.5416.0047%
Revenue2.31B12.4B19%
Total Cash1.34B6.68B20%
Total Debt707M316M224%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPF vs STJPF: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPF
STJPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
5224
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STJPF (49). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (100). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (52). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (42). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLFPF (100). This means that STJPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLFPFSTJPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLDL14.880.63
+4.44%
Direxion Daily Cld Cmptng Bl 2X Shs ETF
KARS22.410.31
+1.40%
KraneShares Eltc Vhl and Ft Mbly ETF
FEMS41.270.26
+0.65%
First Trust Emerg Mkts SC AlphaDEX® ETF
IVOV98.780.44
+0.45%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
COWTF24.04N/A
N/A
Barclays Bank PLC

SLFPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPF and SLFPY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPF and SLFPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPF
1D Price
Change %
SLFPF100%
N/A
SLFPY - SLFPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
STJPF - SLFPF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SLFPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFI - SLFPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
RESCU - SLFPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
HRZN - STJPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
SLFPF - STJPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.93%
SLFPY - STJPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
TETAA - STJPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More