SLFPF
Price
$2.57
Change
+$0.04 (+1.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.51B
STJPF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$1.36 (+8.17%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLFPF vs STJPF

Header iconSLFPF vs STJPF Comparison
Open Charts SLFPF vs STJPFBanner chart's image
ABERDEEN GROUP
Price$2.57
Change+$0.04 (+1.58%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization4.51B
St. James Place Capital
Price$18.00
Change+$1.36 (+8.17%)
Volume$4.7K
Capitalization8.66B
SLFPF vs STJPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLFPF vs. STJPF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLFPF is a StrongBuy and STJPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SLFPF: $2.57 vs. STJPF: $18.00)
Brand notoriety: SLFPF and STJPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLFPF: 52% vs. STJPF: 352%
Market capitalization -- SLFPF: $4.51B vs. STJPF: $8.66B
SLFPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.51B. STJPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLFPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTJPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLFPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPF is a better buy in the long-term than STJPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLFPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STJPF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLFPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STJPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPF is a better buy in the short-term than STJPF.

Price Growth

SLFPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while STJPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($8.66B) has a higher market cap than SLFPF($4.51B). STJPF has higher P/E ratio than SLFPF: STJPF (14.20) vs SLFPF (10.99). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 104.778 vs. SLFPF (45.198). STJPF has less debt than SLFPF: STJPF (402M) vs SLFPF (546M). STJPF has higher revenues than SLFPF: STJPF (16.9B) vs SLFPF (1.68B).
SLFPFSTJPFSLFPF / STJPF
Capitalization4.51B8.66B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.198104.77843%
P/E Ratio10.9914.2077%
Revenue1.68B16.9B10%
Total CashN/A6.4B-
Total Debt546M402M136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPF vs STJPF: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPF
STJPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8740
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
6121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2860
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STJPF (79). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew significantly faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (100). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLFPF (61). This means that STJPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (52). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as STJPF (60). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew similarly to STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLFPFSTJPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASRAX8.27N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Real Estate Income A
RIRBX78.13N/A
N/A
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R2
GONIX14.70N/A
N/A
Gotham Neutral Institutional
LMVFX125.13N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Value FI
KNPCX104.36N/A
N/A
Kinetics Paradigm Adv C

SLFPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPF and SLFPY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPF and SLFPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPF
1D Price
Change %
SLFPF100%
+1.78%
SLFPY - SLFPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STJPF - SLFPF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SLFPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFI - SLFPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RESCU - SLFPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
HRZN - STJPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
SLFPF - STJPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
VSQTF - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
SLFPY - STJPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETAA - STJPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More