SLM vs WLFC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLM is a Hold and WLFC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SLM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWLFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WLFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SLM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WLFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SLM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.24% price change this week, while WLFC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLM is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
WLFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.26% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| SLM | WLFC | SLM / WLFC | |
| Capitalization | 4.8B | 317M | 1,515% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 237M | - |
| Gain YTD | 48.371 | 327.702 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.85 | 7.86 | 113% |
| Revenue | 1.81B | 419M | 432% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 7.07M | - |
| Total Debt | 5.23B | 1.8B | 290% |
SLM | WLFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLM's Valuation (27) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLFC (80). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLFC’s over the last 12 months.
WLFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (9). This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.
SLM's SMR Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLFC (47). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLFC’s over the last 12 months.
WLFC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (38). This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.
WLFC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLM (41). This means that WLFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLM’s over the last 12 months.
| SLM | WLFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DSTL | 55.44 | 0.70 | +1.28% |
| Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF | |||
| FCEF | 21.45 | 0.23 | +1.09% |
| First Trust Income Opportunity ETF | |||
| WEED | 15.70 | 0.17 | +1.08% |
| Roundhill Cannabis ETF | |||
| IGLD | 18.82 | 0.17 | +0.91% |
| FT Vest Gold Strategy Trgt Inc ETF | |||
| NUBD | 21.77 | 0.07 | +0.32% |
| Nuveen ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
SLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLM has been closely correlated with NAVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLM jumps, then NAVI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLM | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| NAVI - SLM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SYF - SLM | 71% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| ENVA - SLM | 69% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| COF - SLM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| DFS - SLM | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||
WLFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLFC has been loosely correlated with NNI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLFC jumps, then NNI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLFC | 100% | +3.20% | ||
| NNI - WLFC | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| GDOT - WLFC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| AL - WLFC | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| SLM - WLFC | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| COF - WLFC | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||