Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs TEFQX
SLMCX vs TEFQX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs TEFQX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$165.80
Change+$1.89 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.9B
Firsthand Technology Opportunities
Price$4.78
Change-$0.04 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.77M
SLMCX vs TEFQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. TEFQX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Hold and TEFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 17.9B vs. TEFQX (48.8M). SLMCX (0.00) and TEFQX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than TEFQX: SLMCX (42 years) vs TEFQX (26 years). TEFQX (1.87) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.16). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. TEFQX (14.00). SLMCX (2000) and TEFQX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TEFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.47 vs. SLMCX (19.12). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.07 vs. TEFQX (-76.12).
| SLMCX | TEFQX | SLMCX / TEFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.85 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.87 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.750 | 26.121 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 48.8M | 36,680% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.12 | 27.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.71 | -37.11 | -199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.07 | -76.12 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.95 | -44.93 | -372% |