Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs UPUPX
SLMCX vs UPUPX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs UPUPX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$147.93
Change+$1.93 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.04B
SLMCX vs UPUPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. UPUPX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Buy and UPUPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. UPUPX (22.3M). SLMCX (0.00) and UPUPX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than UPUPX: SLMCX (42 years) vs UPUPX (27 years). UPUPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.18). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. UPUPX (0.81). SLMCX (2000) and UPUPX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. UPUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.57 vs. SLMCX (18.12). UPUPX return over 5 years is better than : 101.41 vs. SLMCX (61.29).
| SLMCX | UPUPX | SLMCX / UPUPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.354 | 8.264 | 210% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 22.3M | 71,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.12 | 27.57 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.87 | 39.71 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.29 | 101.41 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.95 | -2.03 | -7,722% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement