Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs WFSTX
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs WFSTX
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. WFSTX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Buy and WFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. WFSTX (366M). SLMCX (0.00) and WFSTX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than WFSTX: SLMCX (43 years) vs WFSTX (26 years). WFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.16). WFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). SLMCX (6%) and WFSTX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. WFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: WFSTX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 103.94 vs. WFSTX (-9.50). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 97.78 vs. WFSTX (-41.69).
| SLMCX | WFSTX | SLMCX / WFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.22 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.30 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 53.038 | 7.458 | 711% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.7B | 366M | 7,842% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 103.94 | -9.50 | -1,094% |
| Returns for 3 years | 137.01 | 14.78 | 927% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.78 | -41.69 | -235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 327.62 | 14.54 | 2,253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement