Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs WFSTX
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs WFSTX
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. WFSTX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Buy and WFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. WFSTX (351M). SLMCX (0.00) and WFSTX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than WFSTX: SLMCX (43 years) vs WFSTX (26 years). WFSTX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.16). WFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). SLMCX (6%) and WFSTX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. WFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: WFSTX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.59 vs. WFSTX (-14.75). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 74.58 vs. WFSTX (-48.28).
| SLMCX | WFSTX | SLMCX / WFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.21 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.29 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.393 | 4.907 | 864% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 351M | 7,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.59 | -14.75 | -431% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.37 | 7.98 | 1,308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.58 | -48.28 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 281.22 | 7.76 | 3,623% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement