Ad is loading...
SLYG vs TMFS
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison
Open Charts SLYG vs TMFS
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
Price$80.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.06%)
Volume$367.34K
Net Assets3B
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Price$31.71
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
Volume$1.65K
Net Assets75.38M
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLYG vs. TMFS commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLYG is a StrongBuy and TMFS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLYG has more net assets: 3B vs. TMFS (75.4M). TMFS (-10.384) and SLYG (-10.616) have matching annual dividend yield . SLYG was incepted earlier than TMFS: SLYG (25 years) vs TMFS (7 years). SLYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than TMFS (0.85). SLYG has a higher turnover TMFS (30.00) vs TMFS (30.00).
| SLYG | TMFS | SLYG / TMFS | |
| Gain YTD | -10.616 | -10.384 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 3B | 75.4M | 3,977% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.85 | 18% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 30.00 | 177% |
| Yield | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SLYG | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SLYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYG has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYG jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYG | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| PIPR - SLYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ENVA - SLYG | 83% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| KN - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| TPH - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| MC - SLYG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
TMFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFS has been closely correlated with HXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFS jumps, then HXL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFS | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| HXL - TMFS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| GXO - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| SITM - TMFS | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| QTWO - TMFS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| HRI - TMFS | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
More | ||||