Ad is loading...
SLYG vs TMFS
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison
Open Charts SLYG vs TMFS
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
Price$89.09
Change-$2.94 (-3.19%)
Volume$107.34K
Net Assets3.54B
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Price$34.99
Change-$1.19 (-3.29%)
Volume$19.9K
Net Assets94.42M
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLYG vs. TMFS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLYG is a Hold and TMFS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLYG has more net assets: 3.54B vs. TMFS (94.4M). TMFS has a higher annual dividend yield than SLYG: TMFS (-1.115) vs SLYG (-1.395). SLYG was incepted earlier than TMFS: SLYG (24 years) vs TMFS (6 years). TMFS has a higher turnover SLYG (48.00) vs SLYG (48.00).
| SLYG | TMFS | SLYG / TMFS | |
| Gain YTD | -1.395 | -1.115 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 3.54B | 94.4M | 3,745% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 62.00 | 77% |
| Yield | 1.11 | 0.00 | 45,977% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SLYG | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SLYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYG has been closely correlated with TPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYG jumps, then TPH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYG | 100% | -3.19% | ||
| TPH - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| CVCO - SLYG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| POWI - SLYG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| PIPR - SLYG | 79% Closely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| ACA - SLYG | 79% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
More | ||||
TMFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFS has been closely correlated with GXO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFS jumps, then GXO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFS | 100% | -3.30% | ||
| GXO - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| QTWO - TMFS | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| ALRM - TMFS | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| LOB - TMFS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| MODG - TMFS | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
More | ||||