Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLYG vs TMFS
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison
Open Charts SLYG vs TMFS
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
Price$94.48
Change+$3.17 (+3.47%)
Volume$100.23K
Net Assets3.45B
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Price$36.01
Change+$1.42 (+4.11%)
Volume$36.8K
Net Assets77M
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLYG vs. TMFS commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLYG is a Hold and TMFS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLYG has more net assets: 3.45B vs. TMFS (77M). SLYG has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFS: SLYG (5.134) vs TMFS (1.757). SLYG was incepted earlier than TMFS: SLYG (25 years) vs TMFS (7 years). SLYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than TMFS (0.85). SLYG has a higher turnover TMFS (30.00) vs TMFS (30.00).
| SLYG | TMFS | SLYG / TMFS | |
| Gain YTD | 5.134 | 1.757 | 292% |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 77M | 4,484% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.85 | 18% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 30.00 | 177% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SLYG | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SLYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYG has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYG jumps, then MC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYG | 100% | +3.47% | ||
| MC - SLYG | 83% Closely correlated | +4.57% | ||
| SFBS - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | +6.65% | ||
| NPO - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | +3.49% | ||
| ENVA - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | +5.77% | ||
| KN - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | +6.00% | ||
More | ||||
TMFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFS has been closely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFS jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFS | 100% | +4.09% | ||
| QTWO - TMFS | 74% Closely correlated | +5.13% | ||
| HXL - TMFS | 74% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| RXO - TMFS | 72% Closely correlated | +15.44% | ||
| TREX - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | +5.45% | ||
| IPGP - TMFS | 70% Closely correlated | +4.50% | ||
More | ||||