SMAL
Price
$47.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.75M
SOBS
Price
$28.98
Change
+$0.48 (+1.68%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
46.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMAL vs SOBS

Header iconSMAL vs SOBS Comparison
Open Charts SMAL vs SOBSBanner chart's image
Summit Bancshares
Price$47.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$120
Capitalization9.75M
Solvay Bank (NY)
Price$28.98
Change+$0.48 (+1.68%)
Volume$10.7K
Capitalization46.62M
SMAL vs SOBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMAL vs. SOBS commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMAL is a Hold and SOBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SMAL: $47.00 vs. SOBS: $29.33)
Brand notoriety: SMAL and SOBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMAL: 18% vs. SOBS: 91%
Market capitalization -- SMAL: $9.75M vs. SOBS: $46.62M
SMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.75M. SOBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $46.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SMAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SOBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the long-term than SMAL.

Price Growth

SMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOBS($46.6M) has a higher market cap than SMAL($9.75M). SOBS YTD gains are higher at: 13.073 vs. SMAL (6.237). SOBS has higher revenues than SMAL: SOBS (22.3M) vs SMAL (8.15M).
SMALSOBSSMAL / SOBS
Capitalization9.75M46.6M21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.23713.07348%
P/E RatioN/A9.94-
Revenue8.15M22.3M37%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMAL vs SOBS: Fundamental Ratings
SMAL
SOBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5091
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
770
SMR RATING
1..100
4424
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
734
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOBS's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAL (67). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOBS (70). This means that SMAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAL (44). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAL (50). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMAL (73). This means that SOBS’s stock grew significantly faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RERHX60.150.40
+0.67%
American Funds EUPAC R5E
APHYX24.930.12
+0.48%
Artisan Developing World Institutional
DPRSX12.75N/A
N/A
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets Inst
IGMIX9.97N/A
N/A
Voya Global Insights Portfolio I
GABPX47.84N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income P

SMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMAL and ILPMY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMAL and ILPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAL
1D Price
Change %
SMAL100%
N/A
ILPMY - SMAL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
SOBS - SMAL
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNNF - SMAL
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSBP - SMAL
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - SMAL
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOBS and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOBS and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOBS
1D Price
Change %
SOBS100%
N/A
BNCZF - SOBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRF - SOBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDGSF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - SOBS
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More