Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMAPX vs SMFPX
SMAPX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMAPX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMAPX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX (1.23B) and SMFPX (1.23B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SMAPX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: SMAPX (4.27) vs SMFPX (3.55). SMAPX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: SMAPX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). SMAPX (74.00) and SMFPX (74.00) have comparable annual turnover. SMAPX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. SMFPX (0.71). SMAPX return over 5 years is better than : 152.23 vs. SMFPX (142.73).
| SMAPX | SMFPX | SMAPX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 2.12 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.15 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.926 | 3.154 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 1.23B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 3.55 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 0.71 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.56 | 52.05 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 152.23 | 142.73 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.30 | 95.65 | 116% |