SMAR vs WEBL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMAR is a Hold and WEBL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SMAR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- SMAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
SMAR (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
SMAR is expected to report earnings on Jun 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
SMAR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| WEBL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
SMAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAR has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAR jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAR | 100% | N/A | ||
| COIN - SMAR | 63% Loosely correlated | -8.27% | ||
| CLSK - SMAR | 57% Loosely correlated | -8.05% | ||
| RIOT - SMAR | 54% Loosely correlated | -9.83% | ||
| COMP - SMAR | 50% Loosely correlated | -8.18% | ||
| HOOD - SMAR | 41% Loosely correlated | -7.96% | ||
More | ||||
WEBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEBL has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WEBL jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WEBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBL | 100% | -8.91% | ||
| AMZN - WEBL | 78% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| NET - WEBL | 70% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| GOOG - WEBL | 66% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| GOOGL - WEBL | 66% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| SMAR - WEBL | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||