Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMDIX vs VIMSX
SMDIX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts SMDIX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps I
Price$19.62
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets975.58M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.46
Change-$0.16 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
SMDIX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMDIX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMDIX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. SMDIX (976M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than SMDIX: VIMSX (1.35) vs SMDIX (0.33). SMDIX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: SMDIX (19 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). SMDIX (0.91) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). SMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). SMDIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: SMDIX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. SMDIX (-1.60). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.40 vs. SMDIX (29.58).
| SMDIX | VIMSX | SMDIX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.029 | 10.540 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 976M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.35 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | 13.59 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.58 | 42.92 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.58 | 65.40 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.51 | 143.99 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement