SMDZF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
21.64M
WDFCF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMDZF vs WDFCF

Header iconSMDZF vs WDFCF Comparison
Open Charts SMDZF vs WDFCFBanner chart's image
Strategic Metals Ltd. New
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization21.64M
K9 Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.95K
Capitalization2.3M
SMDZF vs WDFCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMDZF vs. WDFCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMDZF is a Hold and WDFCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SMDZF: $0.19 vs. WDFCF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: SMDZF and WDFCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMDZF: 3% vs. WDFCF: 119%
Market capitalization -- SMDZF: $21.64M vs. WDFCF: $2.3M
SMDZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $21.64M. WDFCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMDZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SMDZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WDFCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMDZF is a better buy in the long-term than WDFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMDZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMDZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDFCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMDZF is a better buy in the short-term than WDFCF.

Price Growth

SMDZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +12.48% price change this week, while WDFCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -23.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMDZF($21.6M) has a higher market cap than WDFCF($2.3M). WDFCF YTD gains are higher at: 222.119 vs. SMDZF (90.653). SMDZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.73M vs. WDFCF (-6.67M). SMDZF has more cash in the bank: 6.14M vs. WDFCF (22.4K). SMDZF (0) and WDFCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SMDZFWDFCFSMDZF / WDFCF
Capitalization21.6M2.3M939%
EBITDA-1.73M-6.67M26%
Gain YTD90.653222.11941%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.14M22.4K27,424%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMDZF vs WDFCF: Fundamental Ratings
SMDZF
WDFCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8480
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMDZF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFCF (93). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFCF’s over the last 12 months.

SMDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WDFCF (100). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew similarly to WDFCF’s over the last 12 months.

SMDZF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as WDFCF (99). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew similarly to WDFCF’s over the last 12 months.

WDFCF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (37). This means that WDFCF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

WDFCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (100). This means that WDFCF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMDZFWDFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANZLY1.70N/A
N/A
Air New Zealand Ltd.
GBLBY8.57N/A
N/A
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
WLTNF0.36N/A
N/A
Wilton Res Inc
ZMTBY2.45N/A
N/A
Zumtobel AG
WELUF12.19N/A
N/A
Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp.

SMDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMDZF and OMZNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMDZF and OMZNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMDZF
1D Price
Change %
SMDZF100%
-1.40%
OMZNF - SMDZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
SYAAF - SMDZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.47%
WDFCF - SMDZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
SMREF - SMDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
SHTLF - SMDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WDFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFCF and SMDZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFCF and SMDZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFCF
1D Price
Change %
WDFCF100%
-0.06%
SMDZF - WDFCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
WHYRF - WDFCF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
MP - WDFCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+8.28%
WMLLF - WDFCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+16.75%
VULMF - WDFCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-11.71%
More