Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLAX
SMFPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. TMLAX (123M). TMLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLAX (4.09) vs SMFPX (3.55). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). SMFPX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.15 vs. TMLAX (-0.90). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 143.68 vs. TMLAX (100.50).
| SMFPX | TMLAX | SMFPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.56 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.56 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.154 | 2.584 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 123M | 1,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 4.09 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.15 | -0.90 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.05 | 40.52 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 143.68 | 100.50 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.65 | 64.32 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement