Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLAX
SMFPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. TMLAX (129M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: SMFPX (3.40) vs TMLAX (3.14). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLAX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). SMFPX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TMLAX (15.79) and SMFPX (15.27) have marching annual gain over last year. SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 134.92 vs. TMLAX (101.77).
| SMFPX | TMLAX | SMFPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.56 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.56 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.599 | 1.203 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 129M | 989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.14 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.27 | 15.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.74 | 31.99 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.92 | 101.77 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.15 | 27.00 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement