Ad is loading...
SMFPX vs TMLAX
SMFPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. TMLAX (141M). TMLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLAX (6.55) vs SMFPX (4.75). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMFPX (12 years) vs TMLAX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. TMLAX (15.00). SMFPX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TMLAX (52.47) and SMFPX (50.43) have marching annual gain over last year. SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 99.75 vs. TMLAX (70.60).
| SMFPX | TMLAX | SMFPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.852 | 8.077 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 141M | 945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.75 | 6.55 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.43 | 52.47 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.30 | 61.59 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.75 | 70.60 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.72 | 19.17 | 186% |