Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLAX
SMFPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Buy and TMLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. TMLAX (121M). TMLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLAX (3.89) vs SMFPX (3.37). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). SMFPX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. SMFPX (5.15). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 159.40 vs. TMLAX (108.49).
| SMFPX | TMLAX | SMFPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.56 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.56 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.392 | 0.005 | 7,698% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 121M | 1,001% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.15 | 6.34 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.22 | 43.61 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 159.40 | 108.49 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.42 | 50.93 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement