Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLPX
SMFPX vs TMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. TMLPX (129M). SMFPX (3.40) and TMLPX (3.35) have matching dividends . SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLPX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLPX (1.28). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLPX (55.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLPX: SMFPX (1000) vs TMLPX (1000000). TMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. SMFPX (15.27). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 134.92 vs. TMLPX (104.10).
| SMFPX | TMLPX | SMFPX / TMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.28 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.28 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.599 | 1.440 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 129M | 989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.35 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.27 | 16.08 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.74 | 32.96 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.92 | 104.10 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.15 | 29.15 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement