Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLPX
SMFPX vs TMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. TMLPX (130M). SMFPX (3.42) and TMLPX (3.34) have matching dividends . SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLPX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLPX (1.28). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLPX (55.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLPX: SMFPX (1000) vs TMLPX (1000000). TMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.71 vs. SMFPX (13.72). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 154.53 vs. TMLPX (117.56).
| SMFPX | TMLPX | SMFPX / TMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.28 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.28 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.086 | 1.905 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 130M | 962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 3.34 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.72 | 14.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.39 | 38.54 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 154.53 | 117.56 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.36 | 37.22 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement