Ad is loading...
SMFPX vs TMLPX
SMFPX vs TMLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLPX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. TMLPX (128M). TMLPX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLPX (3.78) vs SMFPX (3.38). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLPX: SMFPX (12 years) vs TMLPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than TMLPX (1.28). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLPX (55.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLPX: SMFPX (1000) vs TMLPX (1000000). TMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.81 vs. SMFPX (13.62). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 198.75 vs. TMLPX (158.36).
| SMFPX | TMLPX | SMFPX / TMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.28 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.28 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.912 | -5.960 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 128M | 907% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 3.78 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.62 | 17.81 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.04 | 23.75 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 198.75 | 158.36 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.99 | 2.87 | 383% |