Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs VLPAX
SMFPX vs VLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. VLPAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and VLPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. VLPAX (44.6M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than VLPAX: SMFPX (3.55) vs VLPAX (1.98). SMFPX was incepted earlier than VLPAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs VLPAX (10 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than VLPAX (1.73). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. VLPAX (46.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLPAX: SMFPX (1000) vs VLPAX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. VLPAX (-1.29). VLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 213.53 vs. SMFPX (142.73).
| SMFPX | VLPAX | SMFPX / VLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.40 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.73 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.154 | 1.367 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 44.6M | 2,756% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 1.98 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.71 | -1.29 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.05 | 53.06 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 142.73 | 213.53 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.65 | 145.74 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement